PHIO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -- compared to Phio Pharmaceuticals's net margin of -49.65%. Phio Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -- beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 476.13%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 30.77%. Given that Phio Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Phio Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 9.016% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.443, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.681%.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phio Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phio Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Phio Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.8M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of $7.7M. Notably, Phio Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phio Pharmaceuticals is -- versus 0.16x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oragenics has a net margin of -- compared to Phio Pharmaceuticals's net margin of --. Phio Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -- beat Oragenics's return on equity of --.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 476.13%. On the other hand Oragenics has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1998.11%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than Phio Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than Phio Pharmaceuticals.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 9.016% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oragenics has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.446%.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oragenics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phio Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oragenics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phio Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oragenics quarterly revenues of --. Phio Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.8M is higher than Oragenics's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Phio Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oragenics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phio Pharmaceuticals is -- versus 0.46x for Oragenics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tivic Health Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Phio Pharmaceuticals's net margin of -2145.71%. Phio Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -- beat Tivic Health Systems's return on equity of -192.41%.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 476.13%. On the other hand Tivic Health Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Phio Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Tivic Health Systems, analysts believe Phio Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Tivic Health Systems.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 9.016% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tivic Health Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tivic Health Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phio Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tivic Health Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phio Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tivic Health Systems quarterly revenues of $70K. Phio Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Tivic Health Systems's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Phio Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tivic Health Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phio Pharmaceuticals is -- versus 3.45x for Tivic Health Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of -- compared to Phio Pharmaceuticals's net margin of --. Phio Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -- beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 476.13%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1367.51%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than Phio Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than Phio Pharmaceuticals.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 9.016% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 0.816, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.373%.

Phio Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phio Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phio Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Phio Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.8M is higher than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Phio Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phio Pharmaceuticals is -- versus 0.33x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.