PECO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comstock Holding has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Phillips Edison &'s net margin of 12.57%. Phillips Edison &'s return on equity of 2.73% beat Comstock Holding's return on equity of 33.88%.

Phillips Edison & has a consensus price target of $39.18, signalling upside risk potential of 12.62%. On the other hand Comstock Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -44.13%. Given that Phillips Edison & has higher upside potential than Comstock Holding, analysts believe Phillips Edison & is more attractive than Comstock Holding.

Phillips Edison & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock Holding has a beta of 0.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.652%.

Phillips Edison & has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Comstock Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phillips Edison & pays 213.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phillips Edison & quarterly revenues are $178.3M, which are larger than Comstock Holding quarterly revenues of $12.6M. Phillips Edison &'s net income of $26.3M is higher than Comstock Holding's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Phillips Edison &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.04x while Comstock Holding's PE ratio is 8.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & is 7.05x versus 2.44x for Comstock Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eXp World Holdings has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Phillips Edison &'s net margin of -1.16%. Phillips Edison &'s return on equity of 2.73% beat eXp World Holdings's return on equity of -7.78%.

Phillips Edison & has a consensus price target of $39.18, signalling upside risk potential of 12.62%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.39%. Given that eXp World Holdings has higher upside potential than Phillips Edison &, analysts believe eXp World Holdings is more attractive than Phillips Edison &.

Phillips Edison & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings has a beta of 2.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.082%.

Phillips Edison & has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. eXp World Holdings offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Phillips Edison & pays 213.8% of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings pays out -141.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Phillips Edison & quarterly revenues are $178.3M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings quarterly revenues of $954.9M. Phillips Edison &'s net income of $26.3M is higher than eXp World Holdings's net income of -$11M. Notably, Phillips Edison &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.04x while eXp World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & is 7.05x versus 0.35x for eXp World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FRP Holdings has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Phillips Edison &'s net margin of 16.59%. Phillips Edison &'s return on equity of 2.73% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.48%.

Phillips Edison & has a consensus price target of $39.18, signalling upside risk potential of 12.62%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Phillips Edison & has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Phillips Edison & is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Phillips Edison & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.385%.

Phillips Edison & has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phillips Edison & pays 213.8% of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phillips Edison & quarterly revenues are $178.3M, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Phillips Edison &'s net income of $26.3M is higher than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Phillips Edison &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.04x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 75.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & is 7.05x versus 12.29x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Phillips Edison &'s net margin of -11997.76%. Phillips Edison &'s return on equity of 2.73% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of -612.91%.

Phillips Edison & has a consensus price target of $39.18, signalling upside risk potential of 12.62%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Phillips Edison & has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Phillips Edison & is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Phillips Edison & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Phillips Edison & has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phillips Edison & pays 213.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phillips Edison & quarterly revenues are $178.3M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $18.2K. Phillips Edison &'s net income of $26.3M is higher than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Phillips Edison &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.04x while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & is 7.05x versus 7.24x for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.