MKSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electro-Sensors has a net margin of 5.56% compared to MKS's net margin of -2.86%. MKS's return on equity of 9.72% beat Electro-Sensors's return on equity of 2.64%.

MKS has a consensus price target of $117.22, signalling upside risk potential of 12.78%. On the other hand Electro-Sensors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MKS has higher upside potential than Electro-Sensors, analysts believe MKS is more attractive than Electro-Sensors.

MKS has a beta of 1.876, which suggesting that the stock is 87.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electro-Sensors has a beta of 0.236, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.351%.

MKS has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Electro-Sensors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MKS pays 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Electro-Sensors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MKS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MKS quarterly revenues are $936M, which are larger than Electro-Sensors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. MKS's net income of $52M is higher than Electro-Sensors's net income of -$64K. Notably, MKS's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.03x while Electro-Sensors's PE ratio is 42.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MKS is 1.93x versus 1.70x for Electro-Sensors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 5.56% compared to MKS's net margin of 16.57%. MKS's return on equity of 9.72% beat Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 54.9%.

MKS has a consensus price target of $117.22, signalling upside risk potential of 12.78%. On the other hand Frequency Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.58%. Given that Frequency Electronics has higher upside potential than MKS, analysts believe Frequency Electronics is more attractive than MKS.

MKS has a beta of 1.876, which suggesting that the stock is 87.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.469, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.139%.

MKS has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Frequency Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. MKS pays 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Frequency Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MKS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MKS quarterly revenues are $936M, which are larger than Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues of $20M. MKS's net income of $52M is higher than Frequency Electronics's net income of $3.3M. Notably, MKS's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.03x while Frequency Electronics's PE ratio is 8.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MKS is 1.93x versus 2.80x for Frequency Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 5.56% compared to MKS's net margin of 10.78%. MKS's return on equity of 9.72% beat Itron's return on equity of 18.23%.

MKS has a consensus price target of $117.22, signalling upside risk potential of 12.78%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $134.18 which suggests that it could fall by -1.78%. Given that MKS has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe MKS is more attractive than Itron.

MKS has a beta of 1.876, which suggesting that the stock is 87.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.348, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.774%.

MKS has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MKS pays 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MKS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MKS quarterly revenues are $936M, which are larger than Itron quarterly revenues of $607.2M. MKS's net income of $52M is lower than Itron's net income of $65.5M. Notably, MKS's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.03x while Itron's PE ratio is 24.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MKS is 1.93x versus 2.58x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teradyne has a net margin of 5.56% compared to MKS's net margin of 14.42%. MKS's return on equity of 9.72% beat Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9%.

MKS has a consensus price target of $117.22, signalling upside risk potential of 12.78%. On the other hand Teradyne has an analysts' consensus of $96.10 which suggests that it could grow by 3.56%. Given that MKS has higher upside potential than Teradyne, analysts believe MKS is more attractive than Teradyne.

MKS has a beta of 1.876, which suggesting that the stock is 87.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teradyne has a beta of 1.696, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.621%.

MKS has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Teradyne offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. MKS pays 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne pays out 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MKS quarterly revenues are $936M, which are larger than Teradyne quarterly revenues of $685.7M. MKS's net income of $52M is lower than Teradyne's net income of $98.9M. Notably, MKS's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.03x while Teradyne's PE ratio is 26.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MKS is 1.93x versus 5.21x for Teradyne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.