LULU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Summit Networks has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 15.98%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.35% beat Summit Networks's return on equity of -40.17%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $299.69, signalling upside risk potential of 32.54%. On the other hand Summit Networks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Summit Networks, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Summit Networks.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.174, which suggesting that the stock is 17.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Summit Networks has a beta of 8.702, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 770.152%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Summit Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Summit Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Summit Networks quarterly revenues of -$73.9K. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $314.6M is higher than Summit Networks's net income of -$130.6K. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Summit Networks's PE ratio is 780.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 2.58x versus -- for Summit Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 2.12%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.35% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $299.69, signalling upside risk potential of 32.54%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -5.44%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Tesla.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.174, which suggesting that the stock is 17.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $314.6M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Tesla's PE ratio is 176.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 2.58x versus 11.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of -2501.92%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.35% beat Vision Marine Technologies's return on equity of -141.98%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $299.69, signalling upside risk potential of 32.54%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $11.01 which suggests that it could grow by 83.79%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies has higher upside potential than Lululemon Athletica, analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies is more attractive than Lululemon Athletica.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.174, which suggesting that the stock is 17.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vision Marine Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies quarterly revenues of $202.9K. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $314.6M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Vision Marine Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 2.58x versus 1.66x for Vision Marine Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.