LIEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MSC Income Fund has a net margin of 88.82% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC's net margin of --. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 9.79% beat MSC Income Fund's return on equity of --.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.01%. On the other hand MSC Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of $17.75 which suggests that it could grow by 7.97%. Given that MSC Income Fund has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic BDC, analysts believe MSC Income Fund is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.12%. MSC Income Fund offers a yield of 8.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays 129.07% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund pays out 70.3% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chicago Atlantic BDC's is not.

Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are larger than MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of $7.6M is higher than MSC Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.18x while MSC Income Fund's PE ratio is 10.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC is 6.46x versus 10.34x for MSC Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust has a net margin of 88.82% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC's net margin of 20.21%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 9.79% beat Northern Trust's return on equity of 17.48%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.01%. On the other hand Northern Trust has an analysts' consensus of $117.79 which suggests that it could fall by -5.63%. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than Northern Trust, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than Northern Trust.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.035%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.12%. Northern Trust offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays 129.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust pays out 31.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chicago Atlantic BDC's is not.

Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Northern Trust quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of $7.6M is lower than Northern Trust's net income of $392M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.18x while Northern Trust's PE ratio is 11.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC is 6.46x versus 2.90x for Northern Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree has a net margin of 88.82% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC's net margin of -5.16%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 9.79% beat LendingTree's return on equity of -47.16%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.01%. On the other hand LendingTree has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.58%. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic BDC, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.667%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.12%. LendingTree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays 129.07% of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than LendingTree quarterly revenues of $239.7M. Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of $7.6M is higher than LendingTree's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.18x while LendingTree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC is 6.46x versus 0.52x for LendingTree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

180 Degree Capital has a net margin of 88.82% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC's net margin of --. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 9.79% beat 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.01%. On the other hand 180 Degree Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.666%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.12%. 180 Degree Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays 129.07% of its earnings as a dividend. 180 Degree Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are larger than 180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues of --. Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of $7.6M is higher than 180 Degree Capital's net income of --. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.18x while 180 Degree Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC is 6.46x versus 121.08x for 180 Degree Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.