LCUT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of -3% compared to Lifetime Brands's net margin of 2.27%. Lifetime Brands's return on equity of -5.85% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of 1.48%.

Lifetime Brands has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.83%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.7%. Given that Lifetime Brands has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe Lifetime Brands is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.183%.

Lifetime Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Lifetime Brands pays -25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifetime Brands quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Lifetime Brands's net income of -$4.2M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Lifetime Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is 63.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands is 0.14x versus 0.49x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -3% compared to Lifetime Brands's net margin of -2.54%. Lifetime Brands's return on equity of -5.85% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04%.

Lifetime Brands has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.83%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 112.77%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Lifetime Brands, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Lifetime Brands.

Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.11%.

Lifetime Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifetime Brands pays -25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifetime Brands quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Lifetime Brands's net income of -$4.2M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Lifetime Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands is 0.14x versus 0.09x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -3% compared to Lifetime Brands's net margin of -3528.43%. Lifetime Brands's return on equity of -5.85% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Lifetime Brands has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.83%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Lifetime Brands has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Lifetime Brands is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

Lifetime Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifetime Brands pays -25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifetime Brands quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Lifetime Brands's net income of -$4.2M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Lifetime Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands is 0.14x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -3% compared to Lifetime Brands's net margin of --. Lifetime Brands's return on equity of -5.85% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Lifetime Brands has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.83%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lifetime Brands has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Lifetime Brands is more attractive than Northann.

Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lifetime Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifetime Brands pays -25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifetime Brands quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Lifetime Brands's net income of -$4.2M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Lifetime Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands is 0.14x versus 0.32x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.