LCID Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of -155.79% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of 6.32%. Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.52, signalling upside risk potential of 10.18%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $55.64 which suggests that it could grow by 4.62%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than General Motors.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.322, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.192%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $235M, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 6.92x versus 0.31x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -155.79% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of -43.95%. Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.52, signalling upside risk potential of 10.18%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.83 which suggests that it could grow by 19.7%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $235M, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 6.92x versus 2.61x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -155.79% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of 2.12%. Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.52, signalling upside risk potential of 10.18%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -5.44%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Tesla.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $235M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 176.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 6.92x versus 11.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of -155.79% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of -3221.01%. Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -187.31%.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.52, signalling upside risk potential of 10.18%. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could fall by -11.5%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.926%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $235M, which are larger than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $640.9K. Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M is lower than Workhorse Group's net income of -$20.6M. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 6.92x versus 1.13x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.