JAKK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hasbro has a net margin of -2.1% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of 11.12%. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74% beat Hasbro's return on equity of 36.13%.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 85.28%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $80.96 which suggests that it could grow by 4.88%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Hasbro, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Hasbro.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.588, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.246%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Hasbro offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $113.3M, which are smaller than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $887.1M. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Hasbro's net income of $98.6M. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.84x while Hasbro's PE ratio is 25.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.31x versus 2.55x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of -2.1% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of -4.88%. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 85.28%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $24.49 which suggests that it could grow by 25.63%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Mattel.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.704%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $113.3M, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.84x while Mattel's PE ratio is 12.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.31x versus 1.22x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Playboy has a net margin of -2.1% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of -31.31%. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74% beat Playboy's return on equity of -3855.97%.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 85.28%. On the other hand Playboy has an analysts' consensus of $2.40 which suggests that it could grow by 31.15%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Playboy, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Playboy.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Playboy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Playboy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Playboy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $113.3M, which are larger than Playboy quarterly revenues of $28.9M. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M is higher than Playboy's net income of -$9M. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.84x while Playboy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.31x versus 0.99x for Playboy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 has a net margin of -2.1% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of --. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74% beat Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2's return on equity of --.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 85.28%. On the other hand Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $113.3M, which are larger than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 quarterly revenues of --. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M is higher than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2's net income of --. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.84x while Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.31x versus -- for Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.