IQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bilibili has a net margin of 2.54% compared to iQIYI's net margin of -0.13%. iQIYI's return on equity of 2.19% beat Bilibili's return on equity of -4.36%.

iQIYI has a consensus price target of $1.92, signalling upside risk potential of 3.47%. On the other hand Bilibili has an analysts' consensus of $25.87 which suggests that it could grow by 6.65%. Given that Bilibili has higher upside potential than iQIYI, analysts believe Bilibili is more attractive than iQIYI.

iQIYI has a beta of -0.165, which suggesting that the stock is 116.469% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bilibili has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.429%.

iQIYI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bilibili offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iQIYI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bilibili pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iQIYI quarterly revenues are $987.8M, which are larger than Bilibili quarterly revenues of $962.7M. iQIYI's net income of $25M is higher than Bilibili's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, iQIYI's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.01x while Bilibili's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iQIYI is 0.46x versus 2.59x for Bilibili. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

36KR Holdings has a net margin of 2.54% compared to iQIYI's net margin of --. iQIYI's return on equity of 2.19% beat 36KR Holdings's return on equity of -75%.

iQIYI has a consensus price target of $1.92, signalling upside risk potential of 3.47%. On the other hand 36KR Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2156.23%. Given that 36KR Holdings has higher upside potential than iQIYI, analysts believe 36KR Holdings is more attractive than iQIYI.

iQIYI has a beta of -0.165, which suggesting that the stock is 116.469% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 36KR Holdings has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.398%.

iQIYI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 36KR Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iQIYI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 36KR Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iQIYI quarterly revenues are $987.8M, which are larger than 36KR Holdings quarterly revenues of --. iQIYI's net income of $25M is higher than 36KR Holdings's net income of --. Notably, iQIYI's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.01x while 36KR Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iQIYI is 0.46x versus 3.64x for 36KR Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Token Cat has a net margin of 2.54% compared to iQIYI's net margin of --. iQIYI's return on equity of 2.19% beat Token Cat's return on equity of -350.08%.

iQIYI has a consensus price target of $1.92, signalling upside risk potential of 3.47%. On the other hand Token Cat has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22994.2%. Given that Token Cat has higher upside potential than iQIYI, analysts believe Token Cat is more attractive than iQIYI.

iQIYI has a beta of -0.165, which suggesting that the stock is 116.469% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Token Cat has a beta of 0.661, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.855%.

iQIYI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Token Cat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iQIYI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Token Cat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iQIYI quarterly revenues are $987.8M, which are larger than Token Cat quarterly revenues of --. iQIYI's net income of $25M is higher than Token Cat's net income of --. Notably, iQIYI's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.01x while Token Cat's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iQIYI is 0.46x versus 0.25x for Token Cat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weibo has a net margin of 2.54% compared to iQIYI's net margin of 26.95%. iQIYI's return on equity of 2.19% beat Weibo's return on equity of 10.25%.

iQIYI has a consensus price target of $1.92, signalling upside risk potential of 3.47%. On the other hand Weibo has an analysts' consensus of $11.25 which suggests that it could grow by 10.48%. Given that Weibo has higher upside potential than iQIYI, analysts believe Weibo is more attractive than iQIYI.

iQIYI has a beta of -0.165, which suggesting that the stock is 116.469% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weibo has a beta of 0.110, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.032%.

iQIYI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Weibo offers a yield of 8.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. iQIYI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Weibo pays out 64.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Weibo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

iQIYI quarterly revenues are $987.8M, which are larger than Weibo quarterly revenues of $396.9M. iQIYI's net income of $25M is lower than Weibo's net income of $107M. Notably, iQIYI's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.01x while Weibo's PE ratio is 7.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iQIYI is 0.46x versus 1.54x for Weibo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.