GLRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of 16.5% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of 4.96%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 7.04% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.73%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $397.96 which suggests that it could grow by 19.9%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Everest Group.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.660, which suggesting that the stock is 34.042% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.307%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $29.6M is lower than Everest Group's net income of $210M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.26x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.70x versus 0.82x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oxbridge Re Holdings has a net margin of 16.5% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of 15.61%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 7.04% beat Oxbridge Re Holdings's return on equity of -21.13%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.73%. On the other hand Oxbridge Re Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 121.24%. Given that Oxbridge Re Holdings has higher upside potential than Greenlight Capital Re, analysts believe Oxbridge Re Holdings is more attractive than Greenlight Capital Re.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.660, which suggesting that the stock is 34.042% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oxbridge Re Holdings has a beta of 1.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.122%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oxbridge Re Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxbridge Re Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are larger than Oxbridge Re Holdings quarterly revenues of $692K. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $29.6M is higher than Oxbridge Re Holdings's net income of $108K. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.26x while Oxbridge Re Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.70x versus 10.48x for Oxbridge Re Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patria Investments has a net margin of 16.5% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of 17.06%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 7.04% beat Patria Investments's return on equity of 13.9%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.73%. On the other hand Patria Investments has an analysts' consensus of $14.92 which suggests that it could grow by 10.49%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Patria Investments, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Patria Investments.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.660, which suggesting that the stock is 34.042% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patria Investments offers a yield of 5.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patria Investments pays out 184.19% of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are larger than Patria Investments quarterly revenues of $79.7M. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $29.6M is higher than Patria Investments's net income of $13.6M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.26x while Patria Investments's PE ratio is 29.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.70x versus 5.40x for Patria Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reinsurance Group of America has a net margin of 16.5% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of 5.42%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 7.04% beat Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.48%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.73%. On the other hand Reinsurance Group of America has an analysts' consensus of $244.11 which suggests that it could grow by 25.86%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Reinsurance Group of America, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Reinsurance Group of America.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.660, which suggesting that the stock is 34.042% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.623, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.681%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reinsurance Group of America offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America pays out 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are smaller than Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $29.6M is lower than Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $286M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.26x while Reinsurance Group of America's PE ratio is 16.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.70x versus 0.62x for Reinsurance Group of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.