GLBZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Glen Burnie Bancorp's net margin of -1.97%. Glen Burnie Bancorp's return on equity of 0.2% beat Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -4.28%.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blue Ridge Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Glen Burnie Bancorp has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe Glen Burnie Bancorp is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.879% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.778, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.16%.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Blue Ridge Bankshares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Glen Burnie Bancorp pays -772.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Glen Burnie Bancorp quarterly revenues are $2.7M, which are smaller than Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues of $22.1M. Glen Burnie Bancorp's net income of $153K is higher than Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of -$434K. Notably, Glen Burnie Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 544.50x while Blue Ridge Bankshares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Glen Burnie Bancorp is 1.35x versus 3.08x for Blue Ridge Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Glen Burnie Bancorp's net margin of 36.31%. Glen Burnie Bancorp's return on equity of 0.2% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.87%. Given that OptimumBank Holdings has higher upside potential than Glen Burnie Bancorp, analysts believe OptimumBank Holdings is more attractive than Glen Burnie Bancorp.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.879% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.678%.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Glen Burnie Bancorp pays -772.32% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Glen Burnie Bancorp quarterly revenues are $2.7M, which are smaller than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Glen Burnie Bancorp's net income of $153K is lower than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Glen Burnie Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 544.50x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Glen Burnie Bancorp is 1.35x versus 1.21x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Glen Burnie Bancorp's net margin of 32.4%. Glen Burnie Bancorp's return on equity of 0.2% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.08%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Glen Burnie Bancorp, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Glen Burnie Bancorp.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.879% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Park National offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Glen Burnie Bancorp pays -772.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Glen Burnie Bancorp quarterly revenues are $2.7M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Glen Burnie Bancorp's net income of $153K is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Glen Burnie Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 544.50x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Glen Burnie Bancorp is 1.35x versus 5.25x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Glen Burnie Bancorp's net margin of 24.09%. Glen Burnie Bancorp's return on equity of 0.2% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.5%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Glen Burnie Bancorp, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Glen Burnie Bancorp.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.879% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.793%.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Glen Burnie Bancorp pays -772.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Glen Burnie Bancorp quarterly revenues are $2.7M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Glen Burnie Bancorp's net income of $153K is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Glen Burnie Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 544.50x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Glen Burnie Bancorp is 1.35x versus 3.04x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.