FMST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Endeavour Silver has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy's net margin of -51.82%. Foremost Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat Endeavour Silver's return on equity of -14.34%.

Foremost Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 111.5%. On the other hand Endeavour Silver has an analysts' consensus of $6.5833 which suggests that it could grow by 17.14%. Given that Foremost Clean Energy has higher upside potential than Endeavour Silver, analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy is more attractive than Endeavour Silver.

Foremost Clean Energy has a beta of 1.966, which suggesting that the stock is 96.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Endeavour Silver has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.638%.

Foremost Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Endeavour Silver offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Endeavour Silver pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Endeavour Silver quarterly revenues of $63.5M. Foremost Clean Energy's net income of $541.4K is higher than Endeavour Silver's net income of -$32.9M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Endeavour Silver's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy is -- versus 6.48x for Endeavour Silver. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy's net margin of -39.77%. Foremost Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.59%.

Foremost Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 111.5%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.33 which suggests that it could grow by 36.61%. Given that Foremost Clean Energy has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty, analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy is more attractive than Gold Royalty.

Foremost Clean Energy has a beta of 1.966, which suggesting that the stock is 96.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Foremost Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Foremost Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Foremost Clean Energy's net income of $541.4K is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy is -- versus 39.12x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy's net margin of -17.57%. Foremost Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat McEwen's return on equity of -6.05%.

Foremost Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 111.5%. On the other hand McEwen has an analysts' consensus of $15.06 which suggests that it could grow by 36.68%. Given that Foremost Clean Energy has higher upside potential than McEwen, analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy is more attractive than McEwen.

Foremost Clean Energy has a beta of 1.966, which suggesting that the stock is 96.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.544%.

Foremost Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McEwen quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Foremost Clean Energy's net income of $541.4K is higher than McEwen's net income of -$6.3M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy is -- versus 3.39x for McEwen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TMC The Metals has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy's net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat TMC The Metals's return on equity of --.

Foremost Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 111.5%. On the other hand TMC The Metals has an analysts' consensus of $8.85 which suggests that it could grow by 15.23%. Given that Foremost Clean Energy has higher upside potential than TMC The Metals, analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy is more attractive than TMC The Metals.

Foremost Clean Energy has a beta of 1.966, which suggesting that the stock is 96.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TMC The Metals has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.014%.

Foremost Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TMC The Metals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TMC The Metals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TMC The Metals quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy's net income of $541.4K is higher than TMC The Metals's net income of -$20.6M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TMC The Metals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy is -- versus -- for TMC The Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.