FLGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -6.43% compared to Flora Growth's net margin of -49.65%. Flora Growth's return on equity of -256.92% beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Flora Growth has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 330.09%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 31.62%. Given that Flora Growth has higher upside potential than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Flora Growth is more attractive than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals.

Flora Growth has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.443, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.681%.

Flora Growth has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flora Growth pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flora Growth quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are larger than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Flora Growth's net income of -$758K is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of $7.7M. Notably, Flora Growth's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flora Growth is 0.18x versus 0.16x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nanoviricides has a net margin of -6.43% compared to Flora Growth's net margin of --. Flora Growth's return on equity of -256.92% beat Nanoviricides's return on equity of --.

Flora Growth has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 330.09%. On the other hand Nanoviricides has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 306.25%. Given that Flora Growth has higher upside potential than Nanoviricides, analysts believe Flora Growth is more attractive than Nanoviricides.

Flora Growth has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nanoviricides has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.802%.

Flora Growth has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nanoviricides offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flora Growth pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nanoviricides pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flora Growth quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are larger than Nanoviricides quarterly revenues of --. Flora Growth's net income of -$758K is higher than Nanoviricides's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Flora Growth's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nanoviricides's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flora Growth is 0.18x versus -- for Nanoviricides. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oragenics has a net margin of -6.43% compared to Flora Growth's net margin of --. Flora Growth's return on equity of -256.92% beat Oragenics's return on equity of --.

Flora Growth has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 330.09%. On the other hand Oragenics has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2012.89%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than Flora Growth, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than Flora Growth.

Flora Growth has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oragenics has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.446%.

Flora Growth has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oragenics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flora Growth pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oragenics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flora Growth quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are larger than Oragenics quarterly revenues of --. Flora Growth's net income of -$758K is higher than Oragenics's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Flora Growth's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oragenics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flora Growth is 0.18x versus 0.45x for Oragenics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of -6.43% compared to Flora Growth's net margin of --. Flora Growth's return on equity of -256.92% beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Flora Growth has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 330.09%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1402.15%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than Flora Growth, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than Flora Growth.

Flora Growth has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 0.816, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.373%.

Flora Growth has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flora Growth pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flora Growth quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are larger than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Flora Growth's net income of -$758K is higher than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Flora Growth's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flora Growth is 0.18x versus 0.33x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.