FFIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citizens Community Bancorp has a net margin of -16.87% compared to Flushing Financial's net margin of 22.54%. Flushing Financial's return on equity of -6.53% beat Citizens Community Bancorp's return on equity of 7.24%.

Flushing Financial has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Citizens Community Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $17.75 which suggests that it could grow by 19.05%. Given that Citizens Community Bancorp has higher upside potential than Flushing Financial, analysts believe Citizens Community Bancorp is more attractive than Flushing Financial.

Flushing Financial has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.245% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens Community Bancorp has a beta of 0.711, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.877%.

Flushing Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.22%. Citizens Community Bancorp offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Flushing Financial pays -83.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens Community Bancorp pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens Community Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flushing Financial quarterly revenues are $58.1M, which are larger than Citizens Community Bancorp quarterly revenues of $14.2M. Flushing Financial's net income of -$9.8M is lower than Citizens Community Bancorp's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Flushing Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.64x while Citizens Community Bancorp's PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flushing Financial is 2.75x versus 2.74x for Citizens Community Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of -16.87% compared to Flushing Financial's net margin of 32.4%. Flushing Financial's return on equity of -6.53% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Flushing Financial has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.08%. Given that Flushing Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Flushing Financial is more attractive than Park National.

Flushing Financial has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.245% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

Flushing Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.22%. Park National offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Flushing Financial pays -83.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flushing Financial quarterly revenues are $58.1M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Flushing Financial's net income of -$9.8M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Flushing Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.64x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flushing Financial is 2.75x versus 5.25x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of -16.87% compared to Flushing Financial's net margin of 24.09%. Flushing Financial's return on equity of -6.53% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Flushing Financial has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.5%. Given that Flushing Financial has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe Flushing Financial is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

Flushing Financial has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.245% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.793%.

Flushing Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.22%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Flushing Financial pays -83.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flushing Financial quarterly revenues are $58.1M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Flushing Financial's net income of -$9.8M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Flushing Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.64x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flushing Financial is 2.75x versus 3.04x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WSFS Financial has a net margin of -16.87% compared to Flushing Financial's net margin of 25.73%. Flushing Financial's return on equity of -6.53% beat WSFS Financial's return on equity of 10.26%.

Flushing Financial has a consensus price target of $13.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand WSFS Financial has an analysts' consensus of $62.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.66%. Given that Flushing Financial has higher upside potential than WSFS Financial, analysts believe Flushing Financial is more attractive than WSFS Financial.

Flushing Financial has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.245% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WSFS Financial has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.058%.

Flushing Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.22%. WSFS Financial offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Flushing Financial pays -83.12% of its earnings as a dividend. WSFS Financial pays out 13.58% of its earnings as a dividend. WSFS Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flushing Financial quarterly revenues are $58.1M, which are smaller than WSFS Financial quarterly revenues of $256.1M. Flushing Financial's net income of -$9.8M is lower than WSFS Financial's net income of $65.9M. Notably, Flushing Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.64x while WSFS Financial's PE ratio is 12.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flushing Financial is 2.75x versus 3.25x for WSFS Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.