Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Sell
36
ESOA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.85
Seasonality move
:
3.61%
Day range:
$9.01 - $9.90
52-week range:
$6.50 - $19.83
Dividend yield:
0.91%
P/E ratio:
8.98x
P/S ratio:
0.45x
P/B ratio:
3.07x
Volume:
638.5K
Avg. volume:
264.2K
1-year change:
33.69%
Market cap:
$165.2M
Revenue:
$351.9M
EPS (TTM):
$1.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
$90.3M | -- | 12.47% | -- | $20.00 |
|
AGX
Argan
|
$193.8M | $1.09 | 1.07% | 11.83% | $228.00 |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
$1.2B | $1.62 | 17.04% | 25.91% | $272.56 |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
$3.4B | $1.40 | 14.94% | 226.06% | $179.48 |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
$836.2M | $1.52 | 0.11% | 6.99% | $194.2500 |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
$113.2M | -$0.14 | 24.94% | -92.35% | $2.75 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
$9.88 | $20.00 | $165.2M | 8.98x | $0.03 | 0.91% | 0.45x |
|
AGX
Argan
|
$203.84 | $228.00 | $2.8B | 28.59x | $0.38 | 0.7% | 3.14x |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
$256.35 | $272.56 | $7.4B | 32.49x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.56x |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
$176.57 | $179.48 | $13.9B | 64.92x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.12x |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
$192.0300 | $194.2500 | $3B | 88.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.93x |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
$2.27 | $2.75 | $78.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.15x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
48.53% | 3.111 | 32.1% | 1.24x |
|
AGX
Argan
|
-- | 1.905 | -- | 1.70x |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
44.92% | 2.485 | 21.31% | 2.61x |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
43.64% | 2.485 | 23.96% | 1.10x |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
13.71% | 2.056 | 4.97% | 1.26x |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
-283.27% | 1.428 | 50.9% | 0.58x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
$77.9K | -$8.1M | 18.91% | 35.04% | -10.6% | -$1.1M |
|
AGX
Argan
|
$36.9M | $24.3M | 30.42% | 30.42% | 12.57% | $34.9M |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
$247.5M | $85.4M | 10.68% | 19.4% | 7.36% | -$133.5M |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
$311.1M | $36.1M | 4.07% | 7.53% | 1.69% | $31.1M |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
$96.9M | $33.2M | 5.14% | 5.71% | 4.1% | $70.2M |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
$4.7M | -$9.7M | -356.18% | -827.87% | -7.18% | -$38.7M |
Energy Services of America vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or AGX?
Argan has a net margin of -8.87% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 11.64%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 35.04% beat Argan's return on equity of 30.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America0.1% -$0.41 $104.5M AGXArgan19.04% $1.60 $363.9M -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or AGX?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 102.43%. On the other hand Argan has an analysts' consensus of $228.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.85%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Argan, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Argan.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America1 0 0 AGXArgan1 0 0 -
Is ESOA or AGX More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.966, which suggesting that the stock is 3.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Argan has a beta of 0.541, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.95%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or AGX?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Argan offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Argan pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or AGX?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $76.7M, which are smaller than Argan quarterly revenues of $193.7M. Energy Services of America's net income of -$6.8M is lower than Argan's net income of $22.6M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.98x while Argan's PE ratio is 28.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.45x versus 3.14x for Argan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.45x 8.98x $76.7M -$6.8M AGXArgan3.14x 28.59x $193.7M $22.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or DY?
Dycom Industries has a net margin of -8.87% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 4.85%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 35.04% beat Dycom Industries's return on equity of 19.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America0.1% -$0.41 $104.5M DYDycom Industries19.66% $2.09 $2.3B -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or DY?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 102.43%. On the other hand Dycom Industries has an analysts' consensus of $272.56 which suggests that it could grow by 6.32%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Dycom Industries, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Dycom Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America1 0 0 DYDycom Industries8 0 0 -
Is ESOA or DY More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.966, which suggesting that the stock is 3.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.978%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or DY?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Dycom Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Dycom Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or DY?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $76.7M, which are smaller than Dycom Industries quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Energy Services of America's net income of -$6.8M is lower than Dycom Industries's net income of $61M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.98x while Dycom Industries's PE ratio is 32.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.45x versus 1.56x for Dycom Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.45x 8.98x $76.7M -$6.8M DYDycom Industries1.56x 32.49x $1.3B $61M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or MTZ?
MasTec has a net margin of -8.87% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 0.35%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 35.04% beat MasTec's return on equity of 7.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America0.1% -$0.41 $104.5M MTZMasTec10.93% $0.13 $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or MTZ?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 102.43%. On the other hand MasTec has an analysts' consensus of $179.48 which suggests that it could grow by 1.65%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than MasTec, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than MasTec.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America1 0 0 MTZMasTec13 3 0 -
Is ESOA or MTZ More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.966, which suggesting that the stock is 3.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec has a beta of 1.749, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.884%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or MTZ?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. MasTec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or MTZ?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $76.7M, which are smaller than MasTec quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Energy Services of America's net income of -$6.8M is lower than MasTec's net income of $9.9M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.98x while MasTec's PE ratio is 64.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.45x versus 1.12x for MasTec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.45x 8.98x $76.7M -$6.8M MTZMasTec1.12x 64.92x $2.8B $9.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or MYRG?
MYR Group has a net margin of -8.87% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 2.8%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 35.04% beat MYR Group's return on equity of 5.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America0.1% -$0.41 $104.5M MYRGMYR Group11.62% $1.45 $635.8M -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or MYRG?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 102.43%. On the other hand MYR Group has an analysts' consensus of $194.2500 which suggests that it could grow by 1.16%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than MYR Group, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than MYR Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America1 0 0 MYRGMYR Group4 1 0 -
Is ESOA or MYRG More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.966, which suggesting that the stock is 3.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MYR Group has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.821%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or MYRG?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. MYR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. MYR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or MYRG?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $76.7M, which are smaller than MYR Group quarterly revenues of $833.6M. Energy Services of America's net income of -$6.8M is lower than MYR Group's net income of $23.3M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.98x while MYR Group's PE ratio is 88.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.45x versus 0.93x for MYR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.45x 8.98x $76.7M -$6.8M MYRGMYR Group0.93x 88.09x $833.6M $23.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or SHIM?
Shimmick has a net margin of -8.87% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of -8%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 35.04% beat Shimmick's return on equity of -827.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America0.1% -$0.41 $104.5M SHIMShimmick3.85% -$0.28 -$11.2M -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or SHIM?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 102.43%. On the other hand Shimmick has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 21.15%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Shimmick, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Shimmick.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America1 0 0 SHIMShimmick0 2 0 -
Is ESOA or SHIM More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.966, which suggesting that the stock is 3.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or SHIM?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Shimmick offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Shimmick pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or SHIM?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $76.7M, which are smaller than Shimmick quarterly revenues of $122.1M. Energy Services of America's net income of -$6.8M is higher than Shimmick's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.98x while Shimmick's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.45x versus 0.15x for Shimmick. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.45x 8.98x $76.7M -$6.8M SHIMShimmick0.15x -- $122.1M -$9.8M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 19.81% over the past day.
Sell
41
NEGG alert for Jul 18
Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 17.85% over the past day.
Buy
72
MNPR alert for Jul 18
Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is up 13.2% over the past day.
