DWSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Dawson Geophysical's net margin of 33.19%. Dawson Geophysical's return on equity of -42.79% beat CKX Lands's return on equity of 4.15%.

Dawson Geophysical has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 181.69%. On the other hand CKX Lands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dawson Geophysical has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, analysts believe Dawson Geophysical is more attractive than CKX Lands.

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 96.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands has a beta of -0.084, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.398%.

Dawson Geophysical has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CKX Lands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dawson Geophysical pays -239.38% of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dawson Geophysical quarterly revenues are $16.1M, which are larger than CKX Lands quarterly revenues of $348.2K. Dawson Geophysical's net income of $992K is higher than CKX Lands's net income of $115.6K. Notably, Dawson Geophysical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CKX Lands's PE ratio is 32.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dawson Geophysical is 0.75x versus 14.09x for CKX Lands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Empire Petroleum has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Dawson Geophysical's net margin of -38.8%. Dawson Geophysical's return on equity of -42.79% beat Empire Petroleum's return on equity of -56.67%.

Dawson Geophysical has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 181.69%. On the other hand Empire Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dawson Geophysical has higher upside potential than Empire Petroleum, analysts believe Dawson Geophysical is more attractive than Empire Petroleum.

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 96.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empire Petroleum has a beta of 1.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.656%.

Dawson Geophysical has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Empire Petroleum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dawson Geophysical pays -239.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Empire Petroleum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dawson Geophysical quarterly revenues are $16.1M, which are larger than Empire Petroleum quarterly revenues of $10.2M. Dawson Geophysical's net income of $992K is higher than Empire Petroleum's net income of -$4M. Notably, Dawson Geophysical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Empire Petroleum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dawson Geophysical is 0.75x versus 3.02x for Empire Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mesa Royalty Trust has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Dawson Geophysical's net margin of 73%. Dawson Geophysical's return on equity of -42.79% beat Mesa Royalty Trust's return on equity of 13.54%.

Dawson Geophysical has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 181.69%. On the other hand Mesa Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dawson Geophysical has higher upside potential than Mesa Royalty Trust, analysts believe Dawson Geophysical is more attractive than Mesa Royalty Trust.

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 96.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mesa Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.085%.

Dawson Geophysical has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mesa Royalty Trust offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Dawson Geophysical pays -239.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Mesa Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dawson Geophysical quarterly revenues are $16.1M, which are larger than Mesa Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $111K. Dawson Geophysical's net income of $992K is higher than Mesa Royalty Trust's net income of $81K. Notably, Dawson Geophysical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mesa Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 25.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dawson Geophysical is 0.75x versus 18.30x for Mesa Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nine Energy Service has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Dawson Geophysical's net margin of -4.69%. Dawson Geophysical's return on equity of -42.79% beat Nine Energy Service's return on equity of --.

Dawson Geophysical has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 181.69%. On the other hand Nine Energy Service has an analysts' consensus of $0.75 which suggests that it could fall by -6%. Given that Dawson Geophysical has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Dawson Geophysical is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 96.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nine Energy Service has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

Dawson Geophysical has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nine Energy Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dawson Geophysical pays -239.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Nine Energy Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dawson Geophysical quarterly revenues are $16.1M, which are smaller than Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues of $150.5M. Dawson Geophysical's net income of $992K is higher than Nine Energy Service's net income of -$7.1M. Notably, Dawson Geophysical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nine Energy Service's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dawson Geophysical is 0.75x versus 0.06x for Nine Energy Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.