Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Buy
56
CZAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$31.69
Seasonality move
:
5.05%
Day range:
$31.70 - $31.84
52-week range:
$26.29 - $32.06
Dividend yield:
0.85%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
847
Avg. volume:
301
1-year change:
13.08%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SDG
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
$31.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 0.85% | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
$129.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.96 | 1.56% | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
|
$213.64 | -- | -- | -- | $1.71 | 1.86% | -- |
|
SDG
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals
|
$77.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.83 | 1.83% | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
$127.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.93 | 1.51% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | 0.678 | -- | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | 0.711 | -- | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
|
-- | 0.692 | -- | -- |
|
SDG
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals
|
-- | 1.165 | -- | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
-- | 0.658 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SDG
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or ACWI?
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI ACWI ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or ACWI?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or ACWI More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has a beta of 0.933, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.672%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or ACWI?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or ACWI?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or CRBN?
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- CRBNiShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or CRBN?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 CRBNiShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or CRBN More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF has a beta of 0.944, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.648%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or CRBN?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or CRBN?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- CRBNiShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or SDG?
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- SDGiShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or SDG?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 SDGiShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or SDG More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.747%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or SDG?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or SDG?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- SDGiShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or TOK?
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- TOKiShares MSCI Kokusai ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or TOK?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 TOKiShares MSCI Kokusai ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or TOK More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.246%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or TOK?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or TOK?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- TOKiShares MSCI Kokusai ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
72
SBET alert for Jul 18
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 19.81% over the past day.
Sell
41
NEGG alert for Jul 18
Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 17.85% over the past day.
