CROX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nike has a net margin of 17.08% compared to Crocs's net margin of 1.9%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.54% beat Nike's return on equity of 23.12%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $123.82, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $75.77 which suggests that it could grow by 5.09%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Nike.

Crocs has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.963%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $937.3M, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Crocs's net income of $160.1M is lower than Nike's net income of $211M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.32x while Nike's PE ratio is 33.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.48x versus 2.32x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steven Madden has a net margin of 17.08% compared to Crocs's net margin of 7.3%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.54% beat Steven Madden's return on equity of 19.22%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $123.82, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand Steven Madden has an analysts' consensus of $27.63 which suggests that it could grow by 12.39%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Steven Madden, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Steven Madden.

Crocs has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steven Madden has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.62%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steven Madden offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden pays out 36.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $937.3M, which are larger than Steven Madden quarterly revenues of $553.5M. Crocs's net income of $160.1M is higher than Steven Madden's net income of $40.4M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.32x while Steven Madden's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.48x versus 0.77x for Steven Madden. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skechers USA has a net margin of 17.08% compared to Crocs's net margin of 8.39%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.54% beat Skechers USA's return on equity of 13.25%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $123.82, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand Skechers USA has an analysts' consensus of $62.59 which suggests that it could fall by -0.76%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Skechers USA, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Skechers USA.

Crocs has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skechers USA has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.276%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skechers USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skechers USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $937.3M, which are smaller than Skechers USA quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Crocs's net income of $160.1M is lower than Skechers USA's net income of $202.4M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.32x while Skechers USA's PE ratio is 15.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.48x versus 1.06x for Skechers USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of 17.08% compared to Crocs's net margin of 2.69%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.54% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of 25.09%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $123.82, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of $20.78 which suggests that it could grow by 6.72%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Wolverine World Wide, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Wolverine World Wide.

Crocs has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.703, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.271%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out 67.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $937.3M, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $412.3M. Crocs's net income of $160.1M is higher than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $11.1M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.32x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is 22.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.48x versus 0.88x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.