CLIR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -517.71% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of 5.54%. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -51.39% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 300%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 9.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.241%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $401K, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 9.15x versus 0.44x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of -517.71% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of 10.86%. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -51.39% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.06%.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 300%. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand has an analysts' consensus of $91.38 which suggests that it could grow by 6.1%. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Ingersoll Rand, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Ingersoll Rand.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 9.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.427, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.702%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ingersoll Rand offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $401K, which are smaller than Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues of $1.7B. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Ingersoll Rand's net income of $186.5M. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ingersoll Rand's PE ratio is 42.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 9.15x versus 4.81x for Ingersoll Rand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tel Instrument Electronics has a net margin of -517.71% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of -15.36%. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -51.39% beat Tel Instrument Electronics's return on equity of -13.77%.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 300%. On the other hand Tel Instrument Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Tel Instrument Electronics, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Tel Instrument Electronics.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 9.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tel Instrument Electronics has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.666%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tel Instrument Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tel Instrument Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $401K, which are smaller than Tel Instrument Electronics quarterly revenues of $3M. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Tel Instrument Electronics's net income of -$456.5K. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tel Instrument Electronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 9.15x versus 1.99x for Tel Instrument Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of -517.71% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of 13.26%. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -51.39% beat Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.55%.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 300%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $244.70 which suggests that it could fall by -0.94%. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 9.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.118, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.753%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Watts Water Technologies offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $401K, which are smaller than Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues of $558M. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Watts Water Technologies's net income of $74M. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Watts Water Technologies's PE ratio is 28.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 9.15x versus 3.70x for Watts Water Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.