CCBG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 28.58% compared to Capital City Bank Group's net margin of 27.38%. Capital City Bank Group's return on equity of 11.85% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.66%.

Capital City Bank Group has a consensus price target of $42.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.99%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3.97%. Given that Capital City Bank Group has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe Capital City Bank Group is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

Capital City Bank Group has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.645, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.494%.

Capital City Bank Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Capital City Bank Group pays 28.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 40.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital City Bank Group quarterly revenues are $59M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Capital City Bank Group's net income of $16.9M is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $10.2M. Notably, Capital City Bank Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.19x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital City Bank Group is 3.01x versus 3.18x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a net margin of 28.58% compared to Capital City Bank Group's net margin of 33.79%. Capital City Bank Group's return on equity of 11.85% beat Esquire Financial Holdings's return on equity of 19.66%.

Capital City Bank Group has a consensus price target of $42.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.99%. On the other hand Esquire Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $100.50 which suggests that it could grow by 2.45%. Given that Capital City Bank Group has higher upside potential than Esquire Financial Holdings, analysts believe Capital City Bank Group is more attractive than Esquire Financial Holdings.

Capital City Bank Group has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Esquire Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.503%.

Capital City Bank Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Esquire Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Capital City Bank Group pays 28.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Esquire Financial Holdings pays out 11.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital City Bank Group quarterly revenues are $59M, which are larger than Esquire Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of $33.8M. Capital City Bank Group's net income of $16.9M is higher than Esquire Financial Holdings's net income of $11.4M. Notably, Capital City Bank Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.19x while Esquire Financial Holdings's PE ratio is 18.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital City Bank Group is 3.01x versus 6.47x for Esquire Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 28.58% compared to Capital City Bank Group's net margin of 32.4%. Capital City Bank Group's return on equity of 11.85% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Capital City Bank Group has a consensus price target of $42.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.99%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.08%. Given that Capital City Bank Group has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Capital City Bank Group is more attractive than Park National.

Capital City Bank Group has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

Capital City Bank Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Park National offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Capital City Bank Group pays 28.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital City Bank Group quarterly revenues are $59M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Capital City Bank Group's net income of $16.9M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Capital City Bank Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.19x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital City Bank Group is 3.01x versus 5.25x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 28.58% compared to Capital City Bank Group's net margin of 24.09%. Capital City Bank Group's return on equity of 11.85% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Capital City Bank Group has a consensus price target of $42.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.99%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.5%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Capital City Bank Group, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Capital City Bank Group.

Capital City Bank Group has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.793%.

Capital City Bank Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Capital City Bank Group pays 28.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital City Bank Group quarterly revenues are $59M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Capital City Bank Group's net income of $16.9M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Capital City Bank Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.19x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital City Bank Group is 3.01x versus 3.04x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.