CART Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amazon.com has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 11%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat Amazon.com's return on equity of 25.28%.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $52.92, signalling upside risk potential of 10.7%. On the other hand Amazon.com has an analysts' consensus of $246.26 which suggests that it could grow by 10.34%. Given that Maplebear has higher upside potential than Amazon.com, analysts believe Maplebear is more attractive than Amazon.com.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amazon.com has a beta of 1.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.349%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amazon.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amazon.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are smaller than Amazon.com quarterly revenues of $155.7B. Maplebear's net income of $106M is lower than Amazon.com's net income of $17.1B. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.45x while Amazon.com's PE ratio is 36.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 3.96x versus 3.69x for Amazon.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DoorDash has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 6.37%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat DoorDash's return on equity of 4.47%.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $52.92, signalling upside risk potential of 10.7%. On the other hand DoorDash has an analysts' consensus of $232.65 which suggests that it could fall by -0.79%. Given that Maplebear has higher upside potential than DoorDash, analysts believe Maplebear is more attractive than DoorDash.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoorDash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoorDash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoorDash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are smaller than DoorDash quarterly revenues of $3B. Maplebear's net income of $106M is lower than DoorDash's net income of $193M. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.45x while DoorDash's PE ratio is 300.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 3.96x versus 9.21x for DoorDash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 6.06%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat Liquidity Services's return on equity of 13.96%.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $52.92, signalling upside risk potential of 10.7%. On the other hand Liquidity Services has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 67.62%. Given that Liquidity Services has higher upside potential than Maplebear, analysts believe Liquidity Services is more attractive than Maplebear.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.802%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liquidity Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liquidity Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are larger than Liquidity Services quarterly revenues of $116.4M. Maplebear's net income of $106M is higher than Liquidity Services's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.45x while Liquidity Services's PE ratio is 30.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 3.96x versus 1.78x for Liquidity Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wynn Resorts has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 4.28%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat Wynn Resorts's return on equity of --.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $52.92, signalling upside risk potential of 10.7%. On the other hand Wynn Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $114.36 which suggests that it could grow by 4.11%. Given that Maplebear has higher upside potential than Wynn Resorts, analysts believe Maplebear is more attractive than Wynn Resorts.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.839%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wynn Resorts offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 27.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are smaller than Wynn Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Maplebear's net income of $106M is higher than Wynn Resorts's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.45x while Wynn Resorts's PE ratio is 30.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 3.96x versus 1.72x for Wynn Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.