ATRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Astronics's net margin of 12.58%. Astronics's return on equity of -1.37% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.42%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $38.58, signalling upside risk potential of 12.26%. On the other hand Curtiss-Wright has an analysts' consensus of $447.39 which suggests that it could fall by -7.14%. Given that Astronics has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe Astronics is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Astronics has a beta of 1.550, which suggesting that the stock is 55.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.382%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Curtiss-Wright offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $205.9M, which are smaller than Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues of $805.6M. Astronics's net income of $9.5M is lower than Curtiss-Wright's net income of $101.3M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Curtiss-Wright's PE ratio is 42.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.57x versus 5.73x for Curtiss-Wright. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ducommun has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Astronics's net margin of 5.42%. Astronics's return on equity of -1.37% beat Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $38.58, signalling upside risk potential of 12.26%. On the other hand Ducommun has an analysts' consensus of $94.80 which suggests that it could grow by 9.6%. Given that Astronics has higher upside potential than Ducommun, analysts believe Astronics is more attractive than Ducommun.

Astronics has a beta of 1.550, which suggesting that the stock is 55.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ducommun has a beta of 1.360, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.012%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ducommun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ducommun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $205.9M, which are larger than Ducommun quarterly revenues of $194.1M. Astronics's net income of $9.5M is lower than Ducommun's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ducommun's PE ratio is 37.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.57x versus 1.65x for Ducommun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leonardo DRS has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Astronics's net margin of 6.26%. Astronics's return on equity of -1.37% beat Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 9.46%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $38.58, signalling upside risk potential of 12.26%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS has an analysts' consensus of $47.89 which suggests that it could fall by -0.25%. Given that Astronics has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, analysts believe Astronics is more attractive than Leonardo DRS.

Astronics has a beta of 1.550, which suggesting that the stock is 55.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.630, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.979%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leonardo DRS offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $205.9M, which are smaller than Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues of $799M. Astronics's net income of $9.5M is lower than Leonardo DRS's net income of $50M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leonardo DRS's PE ratio is 55.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.57x versus 3.85x for Leonardo DRS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heico has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Astronics's net margin of 14.28%. Astronics's return on equity of -1.37% beat Heico's return on equity of 14.92%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $38.58, signalling upside risk potential of 12.26%. On the other hand Heico has an analysts' consensus of $264.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.06%. Given that Astronics has higher upside potential than Heico, analysts believe Astronics is more attractive than Heico.

Astronics has a beta of 1.550, which suggesting that the stock is 55.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heico has a beta of 1.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.943%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heico offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heico pays out 5.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Heico's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $205.9M, which are smaller than Heico quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Astronics's net income of $9.5M is lower than Heico's net income of $156.8M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Heico's PE ratio is 58.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.57x versus 8.54x for Heico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.