ARHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brilliant Earth Group has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Arhaus's net margin of -0.5%. Arhaus's return on equity of 18.14% beat Brilliant Earth Group's return on equity of -0.06%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 16.86%. On the other hand Brilliant Earth Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.13 which suggests that it could grow by 45.55%. Given that Brilliant Earth Group has higher upside potential than Arhaus, analysts believe Brilliant Earth Group is more attractive than Arhaus.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brilliant Earth Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brilliant Earth Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Brilliant Earth Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are larger than Brilliant Earth Group quarterly revenues of $93.9M. Arhaus's net income of $4.9M is higher than Brilliant Earth Group's net income of -$466K. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.61x while Brilliant Earth Group's PE ratio is 50.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.92x versus 0.20x for Brilliant Earth Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles & Colvard has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Arhaus's net margin of -69.04%. Arhaus's return on equity of 18.14% beat Charles & Colvard's return on equity of -47.77%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 16.86%. On the other hand Charles & Colvard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4659.84%. Given that Charles & Colvard has higher upside potential than Arhaus, analysts believe Charles & Colvard is more attractive than Arhaus.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles & Colvard has a beta of 2.550, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.021%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Charles & Colvard offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles & Colvard pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are larger than Charles & Colvard quarterly revenues of $5.3M. Arhaus's net income of $4.9M is higher than Charles & Colvard's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.61x while Charles & Colvard's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.92x versus 0.03x for Charles & Colvard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OneWater Marine has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Arhaus's net margin of -0.08%. Arhaus's return on equity of 18.14% beat OneWater Marine's return on equity of -1.78%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 16.86%. On the other hand OneWater Marine has an analysts' consensus of $16.75 which suggests that it could grow by 17.54%. Given that OneWater Marine has higher upside potential than Arhaus, analysts believe OneWater Marine is more attractive than Arhaus.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OneWater Marine has a beta of 1.966, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.59%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OneWater Marine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. OneWater Marine pays out -94.92% of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are smaller than OneWater Marine quarterly revenues of $483.5M. Arhaus's net income of $4.9M is higher than OneWater Marine's net income of -$368K. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.61x while OneWater Marine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.92x versus 0.12x for OneWater Marine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunstock has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 6.7%. Arhaus's return on equity of 18.14% beat Sunstock's return on equity of 49.24%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 16.86%. On the other hand Sunstock has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arhaus has higher upside potential than Sunstock, analysts believe Arhaus is more attractive than Sunstock.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunstock has a beta of -5.084, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 608.408%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunstock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunstock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are larger than Sunstock quarterly revenues of $3M. Arhaus's net income of $4.9M is higher than Sunstock's net income of $201K. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.61x while Sunstock's PE ratio is 1.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.92x versus 0.04x for Sunstock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.