Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Buy
57
AQWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$18.99
Seasonality move
:
-0.96%
Day range:
$18.72 - $18.90
52-week range:
$15.53 - $19.57
Dividend yield:
1.36%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.1K
Avg. volume:
2.1K
1-year change:
4.18%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
$18.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.36% | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
$25.84 | -- | -- | -- | $2.15 | 8.32% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$30.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.16% | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
$6.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.44 | 6.71% | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
$19.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 1.61% | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
$69.16 | -- | -- | -- | $2.08 | 3.01% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | 0.862 | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.552 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 0.845 | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.716 | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.366 | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | 1.252 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Clean Water ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or COPJ?
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or COPJ?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or COPJ More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or COPJ?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 8.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.15 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or COPJ?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or CUT?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or CUT More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.551%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or CUT?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or CUT?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or LITP?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or LITP?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or LITP More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or LITP?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF offers a yield of 6.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or LITP?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or SETM?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or SETM?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Critical Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Critical Materials ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than Sprott Critical Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or SETM More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or SETM?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Sprott Critical Materials ETF offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or SETM?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Critical Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Critical Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or SLX?
VanEck Steel ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Steel ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or SLX?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Steel ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Steel ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than VanEck Steel ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 SLXVanEck Steel ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or SLX More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Steel ETF has a beta of 1.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.835%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or SLX?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. VanEck Steel ETF offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Steel ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or SLX?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Steel ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Steel ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Steel ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Steel ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.
Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17
Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.
