AGRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cal-Maine Foods has a net margin of -42.23% compared to AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net margin of 35.87%. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's return on equity of -165.94% beat Cal-Maine Foods's return on equity of 50.26%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1388403.19%. On the other hand Cal-Maine Foods has an analysts' consensus of $105.33 which suggests that it could grow by 0.81%. Given that AgriFORCE Growing Systems has higher upside potential than Cal-Maine Foods, analysts believe AgriFORCE Growing Systems is more attractive than Cal-Maine Foods.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of 0.174, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.562%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cal-Maine Foods offers a yield of 6.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.50 per share. AgriFORCE Growing Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods pays out 33.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems quarterly revenues are $344.4K, which are smaller than Cal-Maine Foods quarterly revenues of $1.4B. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net income of -$145.5K is lower than Cal-Maine Foods's net income of $508.5M. Notably, AgriFORCE Growing Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cal-Maine Foods's PE ratio is 5.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AgriFORCE Growing Systems is -- versus 1.35x for Cal-Maine Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Seafood Technologies has a net margin of -42.23% compared to AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net margin of --. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's return on equity of -165.94% beat Global Seafood Technologies's return on equity of --.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1388403.19%. On the other hand Global Seafood Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AgriFORCE Growing Systems has higher upside potential than Global Seafood Technologies, analysts believe AgriFORCE Growing Systems is more attractive than Global Seafood Technologies.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Seafood Technologies has a beta of 0.495, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.499%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Seafood Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AgriFORCE Growing Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Seafood Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems quarterly revenues are $344.4K, which are larger than Global Seafood Technologies quarterly revenues of --. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net income of -$145.5K is higher than Global Seafood Technologies's net income of --. Notably, AgriFORCE Growing Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Seafood Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AgriFORCE Growing Systems is -- versus -- for Global Seafood Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SNDL has a net margin of -42.23% compared to AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net margin of -7.18%. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's return on equity of -165.94% beat SNDL's return on equity of -8.91%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1388403.19%. On the other hand SNDL has an analysts' consensus of $3.49 which suggests that it could grow by 134.47%. Given that AgriFORCE Growing Systems has higher upside potential than SNDL, analysts believe AgriFORCE Growing Systems is more attractive than SNDL.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SNDL has a beta of 3.399, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 239.899%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SNDL offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AgriFORCE Growing Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SNDL pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems quarterly revenues are $344.4K, which are smaller than SNDL quarterly revenues of $142.5M. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net income of -$145.5K is higher than SNDL's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, AgriFORCE Growing Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SNDL's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AgriFORCE Growing Systems is -- versus 0.59x for SNDL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zalemark Holding has a net margin of -42.23% compared to AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net margin of --. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's return on equity of -165.94% beat Zalemark Holding's return on equity of --.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1388403.19%. On the other hand Zalemark Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AgriFORCE Growing Systems has higher upside potential than Zalemark Holding, analysts believe AgriFORCE Growing Systems is more attractive than Zalemark Holding.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zalemark Holding has a beta of -0.187, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.698%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zalemark Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AgriFORCE Growing Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zalemark Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems quarterly revenues are $344.4K, which are larger than Zalemark Holding quarterly revenues of --. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net income of -$145.5K is higher than Zalemark Holding's net income of --. Notably, AgriFORCE Growing Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zalemark Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AgriFORCE Growing Systems is -- versus -- for Zalemark Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.