AFRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cycurion has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Affirm Holdings's net margin of -264.82%. Affirm Holdings's return on equity of -2.25% beat Cycurion's return on equity of -159.42%.

Affirm Holdings has a consensus price target of $71.11, signalling upside risk potential of 5.8%. On the other hand Cycurion has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Affirm Holdings has higher upside potential than Cycurion, analysts believe Affirm Holdings is more attractive than Cycurion.

Affirm Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycurion has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Affirm Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cycurion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Affirm Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cycurion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings quarterly revenues are $783.1M, which are larger than Cycurion quarterly revenues of $3.9M. Affirm Holdings's net income of $2.8M is higher than Cycurion's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Affirm Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cycurion's PE ratio is 6.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings is 7.39x versus 0.29x for Cycurion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CID Holdco has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Affirm Holdings's net margin of --. Affirm Holdings's return on equity of -2.25% beat CID Holdco's return on equity of --.

Affirm Holdings has a consensus price target of $71.11, signalling upside risk potential of 5.8%. On the other hand CID Holdco has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Affirm Holdings has higher upside potential than CID Holdco, analysts believe Affirm Holdings is more attractive than CID Holdco.

Affirm Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CID Holdco has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Affirm Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CID Holdco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Affirm Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CID Holdco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings quarterly revenues are $783.1M, which are larger than CID Holdco quarterly revenues of --. Affirm Holdings's net income of $2.8M is higher than CID Holdco's net income of --. Notably, Affirm Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CID Holdco's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings is 7.39x versus -- for CID Holdco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lyft has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Affirm Holdings's net margin of 0.18%. Affirm Holdings's return on equity of -2.25% beat Lyft's return on equity of 8.54%.

Affirm Holdings has a consensus price target of $71.11, signalling upside risk potential of 5.8%. On the other hand Lyft has an analysts' consensus of $17.27 which suggests that it could grow by 15.7%. Given that Lyft has higher upside potential than Affirm Holdings, analysts believe Lyft is more attractive than Affirm Holdings.

Affirm Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lyft has a beta of 2.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.226%.

Affirm Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lyft offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Affirm Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lyft pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings quarterly revenues are $783.1M, which are smaller than Lyft quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Affirm Holdings's net income of $2.8M is higher than Lyft's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Affirm Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lyft's PE ratio is 99.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings is 7.39x versus 1.05x for Lyft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Telos has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Affirm Holdings's net margin of -28.1%. Affirm Holdings's return on equity of -2.25% beat Telos's return on equity of -39.16%.

Affirm Holdings has a consensus price target of $71.11, signalling upside risk potential of 5.8%. On the other hand Telos has an analysts' consensus of $3.85 which suggests that it could grow by 37.5%. Given that Telos has higher upside potential than Affirm Holdings, analysts believe Telos is more attractive than Affirm Holdings.

Affirm Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Telos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Affirm Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Telos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Affirm Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Telos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings quarterly revenues are $783.1M, which are larger than Telos quarterly revenues of $30.6M. Affirm Holdings's net income of $2.8M is higher than Telos's net income of -$8.6M. Notably, Affirm Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Telos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings is 7.39x versus 1.85x for Telos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.