ABAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LanzaTech Global has a net margin of -1173.08% compared to American Battery Technology's net margin of -202.77%. American Battery Technology's return on equity of -91.76% beat LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -354.84%.

American Battery Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 330.62%. On the other hand LanzaTech Global has an analysts' consensus of $1.35 which suggests that it could grow by 364.56%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than American Battery Technology, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than American Battery Technology.

American Battery Technology has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.049% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Battery Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LanzaTech Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LanzaTech Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Battery Technology quarterly revenues are $980K, which are smaller than LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues of $9.5M. American Battery Technology's net income of -$11.5M is higher than LanzaTech Global's net income of -$19.2M. Notably, American Battery Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LanzaTech Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology is 80.89x versus 1.18x for LanzaTech Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PureCycle Technologies has a net margin of -1173.08% compared to American Battery Technology's net margin of --. American Battery Technology's return on equity of -91.76% beat PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of --.

American Battery Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 330.62%. On the other hand PureCycle Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $14.33 which suggests that it could fall by -10.08%. Given that American Battery Technology has higher upside potential than PureCycle Technologies, analysts believe American Battery Technology is more attractive than PureCycle Technologies.

American Battery Technology has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.049% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 1.904, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.371%.

American Battery Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PureCycle Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PureCycle Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Battery Technology quarterly revenues are $980K, which are smaller than PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.6M. American Battery Technology's net income of -$11.5M is lower than PureCycle Technologies's net income of $8.8M. Notably, American Battery Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PureCycle Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology is 80.89x versus -- for PureCycle Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of -1173.08% compared to American Battery Technology's net margin of -25.67%. American Battery Technology's return on equity of -91.76% beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.8%.

American Battery Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 330.62%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 57.21%. Given that American Battery Technology has higher upside potential than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, analysts believe American Battery Technology is more attractive than Perma-Fix Environmental Services.

American Battery Technology has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.049% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.285, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.538%.

American Battery Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Battery Technology quarterly revenues are $980K, which are smaller than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $13.9M. American Battery Technology's net income of -$11.5M is lower than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, American Battery Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology is 80.89x versus 3.13x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Republic Services has a net margin of -1173.08% compared to American Battery Technology's net margin of 12.35%. American Battery Technology's return on equity of -91.76% beat Republic Services's return on equity of 18.57%.

American Battery Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 330.62%. On the other hand Republic Services has an analysts' consensus of $259.29 which suggests that it could grow by 7.43%. Given that American Battery Technology has higher upside potential than Republic Services, analysts believe American Battery Technology is more attractive than Republic Services.

American Battery Technology has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.049% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services has a beta of 0.610, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.966%.

American Battery Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Republic Services offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. American Battery Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services pays out 33.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Battery Technology quarterly revenues are $980K, which are smaller than Republic Services quarterly revenues of $4B. American Battery Technology's net income of -$11.5M is lower than Republic Services's net income of $495M. Notably, American Battery Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Republic Services's PE ratio is 36.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology is 80.89x versus 4.69x for Republic Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.