CBOE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 20.97% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 3.23%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 19.2% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $233.33, signalling downside risk potential of -1.59%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $309.19 which suggests that it could fall by -22.35%. Given that Coinbase Global has more downside risk than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Cboe Global Markets is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.93% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cboe Global Markets's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $250.6M is higher than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.07x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 74.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.76x versus 15.48x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 20.97% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 25.37%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 19.2% beat FactSet Research Systems's return on equity of 26.63%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $233.33, signalling downside risk potential of -1.59%. On the other hand FactSet Research Systems has an analysts' consensus of $443.54 which suggests that it could grow by 1.65%. Given that FactSet Research Systems has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe FactSet Research Systems is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.93% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.278%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. FactSet Research Systems offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. FactSet Research Systems pays out 28.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than FactSet Research Systems quarterly revenues of $585.5M. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $250.6M is higher than FactSet Research Systems's net income of $148.5M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.07x while FactSet Research Systems's PE ratio is 31.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.76x versus 7.34x for FactSet Research Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of 20.97% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 24.68%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 19.2% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $233.33, signalling downside risk potential of -1.59%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $198.59 which suggests that it could grow by 9.84%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.93% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.069%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $250.6M is lower than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.07x while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 37.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.76x versus 8.55x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 20.97% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 18.9%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 19.2% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 11.5%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $233.33, signalling downside risk potential of -1.59%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $92.28 which suggests that it could grow by 3.64%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.93% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.97700000000001%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $250.6M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $395M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.07x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 40.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.76x versus 6.60x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.