VLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CVR Energy has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of -7.47%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat CVR Energy's return on equity of -21.31%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $153.37, signalling upside risk potential of 4.94%. On the other hand CVR Energy has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could fall by -16.08%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than CVR Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVR Energy has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.211%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. CVR Energy offers a yield of 9.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Energy pays out 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CVR Energy's is not.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are larger than CVR Energy quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than CVR Energy's net income of -$123M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.64x while CVR Energy's PE ratio is 324.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.36x versus 0.39x for CVR Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of -0.24%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $153.37, signalling upside risk potential of 4.94%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $179.60 which suggests that it could grow by 3.1%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.787%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.64x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 24.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.36x versus 0.42x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of -5.69%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat PBF Energy's return on equity of -17.4%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $153.37, signalling upside risk potential of 4.94%. On the other hand PBF Energy has an analysts' consensus of $21.38 which suggests that it could fall by -12.25%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than PBF Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy has a beta of 0.843, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.656%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. PBF Energy offers a yield of 4.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy pays out -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are larger than PBF Energy quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than PBF Energy's net income of -$401.8M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.64x while PBF Energy's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.36x versus 0.09x for PBF Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 1.6%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $153.37, signalling upside risk potential of 4.94%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $135.35 which suggests that it could grow by 7.51%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.127%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.64x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 28.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.36x versus 0.38x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.