How High Will Brown Forman Stock Go?
On the surface, Brown‑Forman (NYSE: BF.B) is having an unremarkable year.…
Sell
31
CAOVY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.54
Seasonality move
:
-2.22%
Day range:
$8.36 - $8.54
52-week range:
$6.55 - $11.87
Dividend yield:
4.5%
P/E ratio:
8.97x
P/S ratio:
0.73x
P/B ratio:
0.36x
Volume:
1.3K
Avg. volume:
5.6K
1-year change:
-1.73%
Market cap:
$18.7B
Revenue:
$25.8B
EPS (TTM):
$1.42
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment
|
$8.54 | -- | $18.7B | 8.97x | $0.19 | 4.5% | 0.73x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
|
$12.50 | -- | $3.6B | 36.57x | $0.60 | 6.88% | 1.45x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land
|
$5.30 | -- | $9.7B | 19.76x | $0.10 | 7.03% | 9.32x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
|
$11.66 | -- | $33.8B | 15.46x | $0.12 | 4.13% | 3.14x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments
|
$0.49 | -- | $722.6M | 7.16x | $0.01 | 7.79% | 1.87x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings)
|
$5.78 | -- | $8.8B | 80.35x | $0.05 | 1.78% | 5.69x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment
|
40.3% | -0.265 | 162.63% | 0.47x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
|
36.58% | -1.869 | 159.68% | 0.61x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land
|
1.79% | 0.284 | 4.35% | 6.16x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
|
16.81% | 0.534 | 55.99% | 0.56x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments
|
23.41% | -0.176 | 117.2% | 0.58x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings)
|
12.54% | 0.005 | 26.2% | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment
|
-- | -- | 3.47% | 5.72% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
|
-- | -- | 0.46% | 0.68% | -- | -$181.1K |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land
|
-- | -- | 2.14% | 2.17% | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
|
-- | -- | 2.36% | 2.86% | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments
|
-- | -- | -0.57% | -0.73% | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings)
|
-- | -- | -1.43% | -1.64% | -- | -- |
China Overseas Land & Investment vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or KRYPY?
Kerry Properties has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment's net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's return on equity of 5.72% beat Kerry Properties's return on equity of 0.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment-- -- $90.3B KRYPYKerry Properties-- -- $22.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or KRYPY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties, analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment is more attractive than Kerry Properties.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0 0 0 KRYPYKerry Properties0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or KRYPY More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a beta of -0.567, which suggesting that the stock is 156.65% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties has a beta of 0.117, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.271%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or KRYPY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Kerry Properties offers a yield of 6.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment pays 47.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties pays out 242.45% of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kerry Properties's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or KRYPY?
China Overseas Land & Investment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties's net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.97x while Kerry Properties's PE ratio is 36.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment is 0.73x versus 1.45x for Kerry Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0.73x 8.97x -- -- KRYPYKerry Properties1.45x 36.57x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or SNLAY?
Sino Land has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment's net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's return on equity of 5.72% beat Sino Land's return on equity of 2.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment-- -- $90.3B SNLAYSino Land-- -- $21.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or SNLAY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment has higher upside potential than Sino Land, analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment is more attractive than Sino Land.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0 0 0 SNLAYSino Land0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or SNLAY More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a beta of -0.567, which suggesting that the stock is 156.65% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land has a beta of 0.304, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.608%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or SNLAY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Sino Land offers a yield of 7.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment pays 47.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land pays out 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or SNLAY?
China Overseas Land & Investment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's net income of -- is lower than Sino Land's net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.97x while Sino Land's PE ratio is 19.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment is 0.73x versus 9.32x for Sino Land. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0.73x 8.97x -- -- SNLAYSino Land9.32x 19.76x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or SUHJY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment's net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's return on equity of 5.72% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties's return on equity of 2.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment-- -- $90.3B SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties-- -- $94.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or SUHJY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties, analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0 0 0 SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or SUHJY More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a beta of -0.567, which suggesting that the stock is 156.65% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties has a beta of 0.450, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.985%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or SUHJY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Sun Hung Kai Properties offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment pays 47.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties pays out 70.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or SUHJY?
China Overseas Land & Investment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties's net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.97x while Sun Hung Kai Properties's PE ratio is 15.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment is 0.73x versus 3.14x for Sun Hung Kai Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0.73x 8.97x -- -- SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties3.14x 15.46x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or TIACF?
Tian An China Investments has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment's net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's return on equity of 5.72% beat Tian An China Investments's return on equity of -0.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment-- -- $90.3B TIACFTian An China Investments-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or TIACF?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments, analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment is more attractive than Tian An China Investments.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0 0 0 TIACFTian An China Investments0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or TIACF More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a beta of -0.567, which suggesting that the stock is 156.65% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments has a beta of -0.030, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.009%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or TIACF?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Tian An China Investments offers a yield of 7.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment pays 47.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments pays out -141.59% of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or TIACF?
China Overseas Land & Investment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments's net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.97x while Tian An China Investments's PE ratio is 7.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment is 0.73x versus 1.87x for Tian An China Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0.73x 8.97x -- -- TIACFTian An China Investments1.87x 7.16x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or WARFY?
The Wharf (Holdings) has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment's net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's return on equity of 5.72% beat The Wharf (Holdings)'s return on equity of -1.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment-- -- $90.3B WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings)-- -- $20.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or WARFY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings), analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0 0 0 WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings)0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or WARFY More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a beta of -0.567, which suggesting that the stock is 156.65% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) has a beta of 0.197, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.286%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or WARFY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. The Wharf (Holdings) offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment pays 47.96% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) pays out -37.9% of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or WARFY?
China Overseas Land & Investment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings)'s net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.97x while The Wharf (Holdings)'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment is 0.73x versus 5.69x for The Wharf (Holdings). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0.73x 8.97x -- -- WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings)5.69x 80.35x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Bloom Energy Flying Under the Radar?
Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) manufactures scalable fuel cells for providing on-site…
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
61
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
55
TLN alert for Jul 19
Talen Energy [TLN] is up 24.44% over the past day.
Sell
48
CRSP alert for Jul 19
CRISPR Therapeutics AG [CRSP] is up 18.22% over the past day.
Buy
83
SOC alert for Jul 19
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.
