Financhill
Buy
67

XPP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$26.74
Seasonality move :
2.71%
Day range:
$26.68 - $27.10
52-week range:
$13.09 - $28.90
Dividend yield:
2.76%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
11.7K
Avg. volume:
7.1K
1-year change:
80.83%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
-- -- -- -- --
DIG
ProShares Ultra Energy
-- -- -- -- --
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares
-- -- -- -- --
EDC
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs
-- -- -- -- --
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
-- -- -- -- --
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
$26.69 -- -- -- $0.16 2.76% --
DIG
ProShares Ultra Energy
$34.04 -- -- -- $0.20 3.06% --
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares
$9.76 -- -- -- $0.07 2.47% --
EDC
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs
$40.91 -- -- -- $0.25 2.58% --
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
$78.40 -- -- -- $0.34 1.8% --
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
$64.00 -- -- -- $0.29 2.01% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
-- 0.349 -- --
DIG
ProShares Ultra Energy
-- 1.171 -- --
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares
-- 1.738 -- --
EDC
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs
-- 1.072 -- --
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
-- 0.632 -- --
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
-- 1.150 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
-- -- -- -- -- --
DIG
ProShares Ultra Energy
-- -- -- -- -- --
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares
-- -- -- -- -- --
EDC
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs
-- -- -- -- -- --
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
-- -- -- -- -- --
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
-- -- -- -- -- --

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns XPP or DIG?

    ProShares Ultra Energy has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra Energy's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    -- -- --
    DIG
    ProShares Ultra Energy
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About XPP or DIG?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra Energy, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Ultra Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    0 0 0
    DIG
    ProShares Ultra Energy
    0 0 0
  • Is XPP or DIG More Risky?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra Energy has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.74%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or DIG?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. ProShares Ultra Energy offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or DIG?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra Energy quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra Energy's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    -- -- -- --
    DIG
    ProShares Ultra Energy
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns XPP or DRN?

    Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    -- -- --
    DRN
    Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About XPP or DRN?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    0 0 0
    DRN
    Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares
    0 0 0
  • Is XPP or DRN More Risky?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares has a beta of 2.929, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 192.942%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or DRN?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or DRN?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    -- -- -- --
    DRN
    Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns XPP or EDC?

    Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    -- -- --
    EDC
    Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About XPP or EDC?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    0 0 0
    EDC
    Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs
    0 0 0
  • Is XPP or EDC More Risky?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs has a beta of 1.915, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.528%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or EDC?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or EDC?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    -- -- -- --
    EDC
    Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shs
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns XPP or UPV?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    -- -- --
    UPV
    ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About XPP or UPV?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    0 0 0
    UPV
    ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
    0 0 0
  • Is XPP or UPV More Risky?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe has a beta of 1.865, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.534%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or UPV?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or UPV?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    -- -- -- --
    UPV
    ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns XPP or URE?

    ProShares Ultra Real Estate has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra Real Estate's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    -- -- --
    URE
    ProShares Ultra Real Estate
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About XPP or URE?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra Real Estate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra Real Estate, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Ultra Real Estate.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    0 0 0
    URE
    ProShares Ultra Real Estate
    0 0 0
  • Is XPP or URE More Risky?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra Real Estate has a beta of 1.936, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.616%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or URE?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. ProShares Ultra Real Estate offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra Real Estate pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or URE?

    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra Real Estate quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra Real Estate's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra Real Estate's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra Real Estate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    XPP
    ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
    -- -- -- --
    URE
    ProShares Ultra Real Estate
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Is Archer Aviation Stock Going Up?
Why Is Archer Aviation Stock Going Up?

Archer Aviation (NYSE:ACHR) is an aviation startup that is working…

How High Will Brown Forman Stock Go?
How High Will Brown Forman Stock Go?

On the surface, Brown‑Forman (NYSE: BF.B) is having an unremarkable year.…

Is Bloom Energy Flying Under the Radar?
Is Bloom Energy Flying Under the Radar?

Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) manufactures scalable fuel cells for providing on-site…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x

Buy
61
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
55
TLN alert for Jul 19

Talen Energy [TLN] is up 24.44% over the past day.

Sell
48
CRSP alert for Jul 19

CRISPR Therapeutics AG [CRSP] is up 18.22% over the past day.

Buy
83
SOC alert for Jul 19

Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock