How High Will Brown Forman Stock Go?
On the surface, Brown‑Forman (NYSE: BF.B) is having an unremarkable year.…
Sell
48
CBON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.31
Seasonality move
:
-0.66%
Day range:
$22.31 - $22.33
52-week range:
$21.34 - $22.98
Dividend yield:
1.87%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2K
Avg. volume:
1.3K
1-year change:
2.06%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIB
iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
$22.33 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.87% | -- |
|
IBIB
iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF
|
$25.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 4.28% | -- |
|
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
|
$25.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 3.94% | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
$26.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 3.75% | -- |
|
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
|
$26.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 3.52% | -- |
|
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF
|
$20.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 4.56% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.359 | -- | -- |
|
IBIB
iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -0.017 | -- | -- |
|
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | 0.154 | -- | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | 0.293 | -- | -- |
|
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | 0.437 | -- | -- |
|
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.985 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIB
iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck China Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CBON or IBIB?
iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck China Bond ETF's net margin of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- IBIBiShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBON or IBIB?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck China Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF, analysts believe VanEck China Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBONVanEck China Bond ETF0 0 0 IBIBiShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBON or IBIB More Risky?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a beta of 0.540, which suggesting that the stock is 45.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBON or IBIB?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. VanEck China Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBON or IBIB?
VanEck China Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck China Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck China Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- -- IBIBiShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBON or IBIC?
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck China Bond ETF's net margin of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- IBICiShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBON or IBIC?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck China Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF, analysts believe VanEck China Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBONVanEck China Bond ETF0 0 0 IBICiShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBON or IBIC More Risky?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a beta of 0.540, which suggesting that the stock is 45.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBON or IBIC?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. VanEck China Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBON or IBIC?
VanEck China Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck China Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck China Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- -- IBICiShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBON or IBID?
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck China Bond ETF's net margin of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- IBIDiShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBON or IBID?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck China Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF, analysts believe VanEck China Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBONVanEck China Bond ETF0 0 0 IBIDiShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBON or IBID More Risky?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a beta of 0.540, which suggesting that the stock is 45.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBON or IBID?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. VanEck China Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBON or IBID?
VanEck China Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck China Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck China Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- -- IBIDiShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBON or IBIE?
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck China Bond ETF's net margin of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- IBIEiShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBON or IBIE?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck China Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF, analysts believe VanEck China Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBONVanEck China Bond ETF0 0 0 IBIEiShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBON or IBIE More Risky?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a beta of 0.540, which suggesting that the stock is 45.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBON or IBIE?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. VanEck China Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBON or IBIE?
VanEck China Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck China Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck China Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- -- IBIEiShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBON or NUAG?
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck China Bond ETF's net margin of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- NUAGNuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBON or NUAG?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck China Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF, analysts believe VanEck China Bond ETF is more attractive than Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBONVanEck China Bond ETF0 0 0 NUAGNuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBON or NUAG More Risky?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a beta of 0.540, which suggesting that the stock is 45.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.962%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBON or NUAG?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. VanEck China Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBON or NUAG?
VanEck China Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck China Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck China Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- -- NUAGNuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Bloom Energy Flying Under the Radar?
Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) manufactures scalable fuel cells for providing on-site…
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
61
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
55
TLN alert for Jul 19
Talen Energy [TLN] is up 24.44% over the past day.
Sell
48
CRSP alert for Jul 19
CRISPR Therapeutics AG [CRSP] is up 18.22% over the past day.
Buy
83
SOC alert for Jul 19
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.
