YUMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cava Group has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Yum China Holdings's net margin of 7.75%. Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 14.02% beat Cava Group's return on equity of 22.09%.

Yum China Holdings has a consensus price target of $58.83, signalling upside risk potential of 25.63%. On the other hand Cava Group has an analysts' consensus of $110.48 which suggests that it could grow by 26.5%. Given that Cava Group has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, analysts believe Cava Group is more attractive than Yum China Holdings.

Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cava Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Yum China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Cava Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yum China Holdings pays 27.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Cava Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Cava Group quarterly revenues of $331.8M. Yum China Holdings's net income of $292M is higher than Cava Group's net income of $25.7M. Notably, Yum China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while Cava Group's PE ratio is 72.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings is 1.59x versus 9.98x for Cava Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Yum China Holdings's net margin of 4.6%. Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 14.02% beat El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.82%.

Yum China Holdings has a consensus price target of $58.83, signalling upside risk potential of 25.63%. On the other hand El Pollo Loco Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.7%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Yum China Holdings.

Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.403%.

Yum China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. El Pollo Loco Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yum China Holdings pays 27.22% of its earnings as a dividend. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues of $119.2M. Yum China Holdings's net income of $292M is higher than El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Yum China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while El Pollo Loco Holdings's PE ratio is 12.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings is 1.59x versus 0.66x for El Pollo Loco Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wendy's has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Yum China Holdings's net margin of 7.5%. Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 14.02% beat The Wendy's's return on equity of 78.73%.

Yum China Holdings has a consensus price target of $58.83, signalling upside risk potential of 25.63%. On the other hand The Wendy's has an analysts' consensus of $13.73 which suggests that it could grow by 31.1%. Given that The Wendy's has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, analysts believe The Wendy's is more attractive than Yum China Holdings.

Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wendy's has a beta of 0.342, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.787%.

Yum China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. The Wendy's offers a yield of 8.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Yum China Holdings pays 27.22% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wendy's pays out 105.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Wendy's's is not.

Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than The Wendy's quarterly revenues of $523.5M. Yum China Holdings's net income of $292M is higher than The Wendy's's net income of $39.2M. Notably, Yum China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while The Wendy's's PE ratio is 11.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings is 1.59x versus 0.96x for The Wendy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Yum China Holdings's net margin of 14.16%. Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 14.02% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Yum China Holdings has a consensus price target of $58.83, signalling upside risk potential of 25.63%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $159.39 which suggests that it could grow by 7%. Given that Yum China Holdings has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Yum China Holdings is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.237%.

Yum China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Yum China Holdings pays 27.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Yum China Holdings's net income of $292M is higher than Yum Brands's net income of $253M. Notably, Yum China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 29.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings is 1.59x versus 5.48x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.