RH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Live Ventures has a net margin of 0.99% compared to RH's net margin of 14.83%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Live Ventures's return on equity of -7.51%.

RH has a consensus price target of $257.24, signalling upside risk potential of 31.59%. On the other hand Live Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 927.55%. Given that Live Ventures has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe Live Ventures is more attractive than RH.

RH has a beta of 2.171, which suggesting that the stock is 117.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Live Ventures has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.068%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Live Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Live Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $814M, which are larger than Live Ventures quarterly revenues of $107M. RH's net income of $8M is lower than Live Ventures's net income of $15.9M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.55x while Live Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.20x versus 0.09x for Live Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stitch Fix has a net margin of 0.99% compared to RH's net margin of -2.27%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Stitch Fix's return on equity of -28.78%.

RH has a consensus price target of $257.24, signalling upside risk potential of 31.59%. On the other hand Stitch Fix has an analysts' consensus of $5.06 which suggests that it could grow by 9.48%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Stitch Fix, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Stitch Fix.

RH has a beta of 2.171, which suggesting that the stock is 117.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stitch Fix has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.025%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stitch Fix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stitch Fix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $814M, which are larger than Stitch Fix quarterly revenues of $325M. RH's net income of $8M is higher than Stitch Fix's net income of -$7.4M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.55x while Stitch Fix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.20x versus 0.46x for Stitch Fix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tile Shop Holdings has a net margin of 0.99% compared to RH's net margin of 0.2%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Tile Shop Holdings's return on equity of 0.66%.

RH has a consensus price target of $257.24, signalling upside risk potential of 31.59%. On the other hand Tile Shop Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.85%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Tile Shop Holdings, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Tile Shop Holdings.

RH has a beta of 2.171, which suggesting that the stock is 117.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tile Shop Holdings has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.482%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tile Shop Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tile Shop Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $814M, which are larger than Tile Shop Holdings quarterly revenues of $88M. RH's net income of $8M is higher than Tile Shop Holdings's net income of $172K. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.55x while Tile Shop Holdings's PE ratio is 329.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.20x versus 0.88x for Tile Shop Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma has a net margin of 0.99% compared to RH's net margin of 13.37%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 51.12%.

RH has a consensus price target of $257.24, signalling upside risk potential of 31.59%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma has an analysts' consensus of $177.52 which suggests that it could grow by 4.18%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

RH has a beta of 2.171, which suggesting that the stock is 117.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.547%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma pays out 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RH quarterly revenues are $814M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues of $1.7B. RH's net income of $8M is lower than Williams-Sonoma's net income of $231.3M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.55x while Williams-Sonoma's PE ratio is 19.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.20x versus 2.77x for Williams-Sonoma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.