QS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AutoZone has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of 13.63%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat AutoZone's return on equity of --.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $4.79, signalling downside risk potential of -67.3%. On the other hand AutoZone has an analysts' consensus of $4,080.01 which suggests that it could grow by 9.86%. Given that AutoZone has higher upside potential than QuantumScape, analysts believe AutoZone is more attractive than QuantumScape.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AutoZone has a beta of 0.388, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.241%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AutoZone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AutoZone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AutoZone quarterly revenues of $4.5B. QuantumScape's net income of -$114.4M is lower than AutoZone's net income of $608.4M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AutoZone's PE ratio is 25.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 3.40x for AutoZone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nuvve Holding has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of -825.23%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat Nuvve Holding's return on equity of -1203%.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $4.79, signalling downside risk potential of -67.3%. On the other hand Nuvve Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 115680.94%. Given that Nuvve Holding has higher upside potential than QuantumScape, analysts believe Nuvve Holding is more attractive than QuantumScape.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuvve Holding has a beta of 2.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.82%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuvve Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuvve Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuvve Holding quarterly revenues of $832.9K. QuantumScape's net income of -$114.4M is lower than Nuvve Holding's net income of -$6.9M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuvve Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 0.17x for Nuvve Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O'Reilly Automotive has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of 13.02%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat O'Reilly Automotive's return on equity of --.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $4.79, signalling downside risk potential of -67.3%. On the other hand O'Reilly Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $95.21 which suggests that it could grow by 3.11%. Given that O'Reilly Automotive has higher upside potential than QuantumScape, analysts believe O'Reilly Automotive is more attractive than QuantumScape.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O'Reilly Automotive has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.829%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. O'Reilly Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. O'Reilly Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than O'Reilly Automotive quarterly revenues of $4.1B. QuantumScape's net income of -$114.4M is lower than O'Reilly Automotive's net income of $538.5M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while O'Reilly Automotive's PE ratio is 33.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 4.78x for O'Reilly Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarParts.com has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of -10.37%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat CarParts.com's return on equity of -52.76%.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $4.79, signalling downside risk potential of -67.3%. On the other hand CarParts.com has an analysts' consensus of $1.90 which suggests that it could grow by 139.63%. Given that CarParts.com has higher upside potential than QuantumScape, analysts believe CarParts.com is more attractive than QuantumScape.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarParts.com has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.36%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarParts.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarParts.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CarParts.com quarterly revenues of $147.4M. QuantumScape's net income of -$114.4M is lower than CarParts.com's net income of -$15.3M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CarParts.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 0.08x for CarParts.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.