JILL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Torrid Holdings has a net margin of 7.61% compared to J.Jill's net margin of 2.23%. J.Jill's return on equity of 37.12% beat Torrid Holdings's return on equity of --.

J.Jill has a consensus price target of $21.60, signalling upside risk potential of 43.62%. On the other hand Torrid Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.20 which suggests that it could grow by 91.18%. Given that Torrid Holdings has higher upside potential than J.Jill, analysts believe Torrid Holdings is more attractive than J.Jill.

J.Jill has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Torrid Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

J.Jill has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Torrid Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. J.Jill pays 7.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Torrid Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. J.Jill's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

J.Jill quarterly revenues are $153.6M, which are smaller than Torrid Holdings quarterly revenues of $266M. J.Jill's net income of $11.7M is higher than Torrid Holdings's net income of $5.9M. Notably, J.Jill's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.71x while Torrid Holdings's PE ratio is 27.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for J.Jill is 0.38x versus 0.26x for Torrid Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stitch Fix has a net margin of 7.61% compared to J.Jill's net margin of -2.27%. J.Jill's return on equity of 37.12% beat Stitch Fix's return on equity of -28.78%.

J.Jill has a consensus price target of $21.60, signalling upside risk potential of 43.62%. On the other hand Stitch Fix has an analysts' consensus of $5.06 which suggests that it could grow by 9.48%. Given that J.Jill has higher upside potential than Stitch Fix, analysts believe J.Jill is more attractive than Stitch Fix.

J.Jill has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stitch Fix has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.025%.

J.Jill has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Stitch Fix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. J.Jill pays 7.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Stitch Fix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. J.Jill's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

J.Jill quarterly revenues are $153.6M, which are smaller than Stitch Fix quarterly revenues of $325M. J.Jill's net income of $11.7M is higher than Stitch Fix's net income of -$7.4M. Notably, J.Jill's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.71x while Stitch Fix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for J.Jill is 0.38x versus 0.46x for Stitch Fix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria's Secret & has a net margin of 7.61% compared to J.Jill's net margin of -0.15%. J.Jill's return on equity of 37.12% beat Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 30.6%.

J.Jill has a consensus price target of $21.60, signalling upside risk potential of 43.62%. On the other hand Victoria's Secret & has an analysts' consensus of $22.09 which suggests that it could grow by 16.02%. Given that J.Jill has higher upside potential than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe J.Jill is more attractive than Victoria's Secret &.

J.Jill has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

J.Jill has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Victoria's Secret & offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. J.Jill pays 7.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria's Secret & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. J.Jill's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

J.Jill quarterly revenues are $153.6M, which are smaller than Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues of $1.4B. J.Jill's net income of $11.7M is higher than Victoria's Secret &'s net income of -$2M. Notably, J.Jill's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.71x while Victoria's Secret &'s PE ratio is 9.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for J.Jill is 0.38x versus 0.25x for Victoria's Secret &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zumiez has a net margin of 7.61% compared to J.Jill's net margin of -7.77%. J.Jill's return on equity of 37.12% beat Zumiez's return on equity of 0.23%.

J.Jill has a consensus price target of $21.60, signalling upside risk potential of 43.62%. On the other hand Zumiez has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.01%. Given that J.Jill has higher upside potential than Zumiez, analysts believe J.Jill is more attractive than Zumiez.

J.Jill has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zumiez has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.438%.

J.Jill has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Zumiez offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. J.Jill pays 7.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Zumiez pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. J.Jill's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

J.Jill quarterly revenues are $153.6M, which are smaller than Zumiez quarterly revenues of $184.3M. J.Jill's net income of $11.7M is higher than Zumiez's net income of -$14.3M. Notably, J.Jill's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.71x while Zumiez's PE ratio is 1,346.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for J.Jill is 0.38x versus 0.28x for Zumiez. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.