INGM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CoreWeave has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Ingram Micro Holding's net margin of --. Ingram Micro Holding's return on equity of 9.18% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.

Ingram Micro Holding has a consensus price target of $24.31, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ingram Micro Holding has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe Ingram Micro Holding is more attractive than CoreWeave.

Ingram Micro Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ingram Micro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingram Micro Holding pays 2.34% of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingram Micro Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingram Micro Holding quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. Ingram Micro Holding's net income of $77M is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, Ingram Micro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingram Micro Holding is 0.10x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Ingram Micro Holding's net margin of -10.03%. Ingram Micro Holding's return on equity of 9.18% beat Castellum's return on equity of -42.29%.

Ingram Micro Holding has a consensus price target of $24.31, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 101.34%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Ingram Micro Holding, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Ingram Micro Holding.

Ingram Micro Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -4.018, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 501.827%.

Ingram Micro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingram Micro Holding pays 2.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingram Micro Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingram Micro Holding quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.7M. Ingram Micro Holding's net income of $77M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Ingram Micro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingram Micro Holding is 0.10x versus 2.08x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Ingram Micro Holding's net margin of 12.96%. Ingram Micro Holding's return on equity of 9.18% beat Cognizant Technology Solutions's return on equity of 16.56%.

Ingram Micro Holding has a consensus price target of $24.31, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $88.24 which suggests that it could grow by 16.59%. Given that Ingram Micro Holding has higher upside potential than Cognizant Technology Solutions, analysts believe Ingram Micro Holding is more attractive than Cognizant Technology Solutions.

Ingram Micro Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 0.957, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.288%.

Ingram Micro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Ingram Micro Holding pays 2.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 26.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingram Micro Holding quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than Cognizant Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Ingram Micro Holding's net income of $77M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions's net income of $663M. Notably, Ingram Micro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while Cognizant Technology Solutions's PE ratio is 15.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingram Micro Holding is 0.10x versus 1.87x for Cognizant Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Ingram Micro Holding's net margin of -35.76%. Ingram Micro Holding's return on equity of 9.18% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 20.97%.

Ingram Micro Holding has a consensus price target of $24.31, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $58.83 which suggests that it could grow by 54.42%. Given that Exodus Movement has higher upside potential than Ingram Micro Holding, analysts believe Exodus Movement is more attractive than Ingram Micro Holding.

Ingram Micro Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ingram Micro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingram Micro Holding pays 2.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingram Micro Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingram Micro Holding quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $36M. Ingram Micro Holding's net income of $77M is higher than Exodus Movement's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, Ingram Micro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 29.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingram Micro Holding is 0.10x versus 9.11x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.