GPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GreetEat has a net margin of 12.68% compared to Global Payments's net margin of --. Global Payments's return on equity of 6.75% beat GreetEat's return on equity of --.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $99.18, signalling upside risk potential of 21.05%. On the other hand GreetEat has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 603.93%. Given that GreetEat has higher upside potential than Global Payments, analysts believe GreetEat is more attractive than Global Payments.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GreetEat has a beta of 4.360, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 336.02%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. GreetEat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Payments pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. GreetEat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than GreetEat quarterly revenues of --. Global Payments's net income of $305.7M is higher than GreetEat's net income of --. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while GreetEat's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 2.05x versus -- for GreetEat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercard has a net margin of 12.68% compared to Global Payments's net margin of 45.24%. Global Payments's return on equity of 6.75% beat Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12%.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $99.18, signalling upside risk potential of 21.05%. On the other hand Mastercard has an analysts' consensus of $626.93 which suggests that it could grow by 13.44%. Given that Global Payments has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe Global Payments is more attractive than Mastercard.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard has a beta of 1.024, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.368%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Mastercard offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Global Payments pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Mastercard quarterly revenues of $7.3B. Global Payments's net income of $305.7M is lower than Mastercard's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while Mastercard's PE ratio is 38.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 2.05x versus 17.52x for Mastercard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOMI Environmental Solutions has a net margin of 12.68% compared to Global Payments's net margin of -16.21%. Global Payments's return on equity of 6.75% beat TOMI Environmental Solutions's return on equity of -57.67%.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $99.18, signalling upside risk potential of 21.05%. On the other hand TOMI Environmental Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 268.42%. Given that TOMI Environmental Solutions has higher upside potential than Global Payments, analysts believe TOMI Environmental Solutions is more attractive than Global Payments.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOMI Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.572%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. TOMI Environmental Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Payments pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. TOMI Environmental Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than TOMI Environmental Solutions quarterly revenues of $1.6M. Global Payments's net income of $305.7M is higher than TOMI Environmental Solutions's net income of -$255.6K. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while TOMI Environmental Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 2.05x versus 2.38x for TOMI Environmental Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa has a net margin of 12.68% compared to Global Payments's net margin of 47.71%. Global Payments's return on equity of 6.75% beat Visa's return on equity of 50.81%.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $99.18, signalling upside risk potential of 21.05%. On the other hand Visa has an analysts' consensus of $384.65 which suggests that it could grow by 10.2%. Given that Global Payments has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Global Payments is more attractive than Visa.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa has a beta of 0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.716%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Visa offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Global Payments pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Visa quarterly revenues of $9.6B. Global Payments's net income of $305.7M is lower than Visa's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while Visa's PE ratio is 35.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 2.05x versus 18.53x for Visa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.