GIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of 4.32%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.27% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 19.64%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.21%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $95.00 which suggests that it could fall by -4.63%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than DXP Enterprises, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than DXP Enterprises.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.156, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.594%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $321M, which are smaller than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $476.6M. Global Industrial's net income of $13.6M is lower than DXP Enterprises's net income of $20.6M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.03x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 20.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.79x versus 0.89x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVI Industries has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of 1.11%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.27% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.46%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.21%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.16%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than EVI Industries.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.033, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.66%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $321M, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $93.5M. Global Industrial's net income of $13.6M is higher than EVI Industries's net income of $1M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.03x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 47.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.79x versus 0.81x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of -2.16%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.27% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity of 22.04%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.21%. On the other hand L.B. Foster has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.53%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than L.B. Foster.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.987, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.298%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. L.B. Foster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $321M, which are larger than L.B. Foster quarterly revenues of $97.8M. Global Industrial's net income of $13.6M is higher than L.B. Foster's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.03x while L.B. Foster's PE ratio is 6.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.79x versus 0.49x for L.B. Foster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of -0.49%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.27% beat Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.77%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.21%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.4%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.84%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Ryerson Holding offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding pays out -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $321M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Global Industrial's net income of $13.6M is higher than Ryerson Holding's net income of -$5.6M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.03x while Ryerson Holding's PE ratio is 36.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.79x versus 0.17x for Ryerson Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.