OSW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HWH International has a net margin of 6.95% compared to OneSpaWorld Holdings's net margin of -191.44%. OneSpaWorld Holdings's return on equity of 12.53% beat HWH International's return on equity of --.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.47%. On the other hand HWH International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that OneSpaWorld Holdings has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe OneSpaWorld Holdings is more attractive than HWH International.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HWH International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. HWH International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OneSpaWorld Holdings pays 11.43% of its earnings as a dividend. HWH International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. OneSpaWorld Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OneSpaWorld Holdings quarterly revenues are $219.6M, which are larger than HWH International quarterly revenues of $295.2K. OneSpaWorld Holdings's net income of $15.3M is higher than HWH International's net income of -$565.1K. Notably, OneSpaWorld Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while HWH International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneSpaWorld Holdings is 2.51x versus 4.84x for HWH International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Life Time Group Holdings has a net margin of 6.95% compared to OneSpaWorld Holdings's net margin of 10.78%. OneSpaWorld Holdings's return on equity of 12.53% beat Life Time Group Holdings's return on equity of 8.25%.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.47%. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $38.10 which suggests that it could grow by 25.49%. Given that Life Time Group Holdings has higher upside potential than OneSpaWorld Holdings, analysts believe Life Time Group Holdings is more attractive than OneSpaWorld Holdings.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Life Time Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OneSpaWorld Holdings pays 11.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. OneSpaWorld Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OneSpaWorld Holdings quarterly revenues are $219.6M, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $706M. OneSpaWorld Holdings's net income of $15.3M is lower than Life Time Group Holdings's net income of $76.1M. Notably, OneSpaWorld Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while Life Time Group Holdings's PE ratio is 31.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneSpaWorld Holdings is 2.51x versus 2.41x for Life Time Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 6.95% compared to OneSpaWorld Holdings's net margin of 15.13%. OneSpaWorld Holdings's return on equity of 12.53% beat Planet Fitness's return on equity of --.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.47%. On the other hand Planet Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $115.90 which suggests that it could grow by 3.04%. Given that Planet Fitness has higher upside potential than OneSpaWorld Holdings, analysts believe Planet Fitness is more attractive than OneSpaWorld Holdings.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.169%.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Planet Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OneSpaWorld Holdings pays 11.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. OneSpaWorld Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OneSpaWorld Holdings quarterly revenues are $219.6M, which are smaller than Planet Fitness quarterly revenues of $276.7M. OneSpaWorld Holdings's net income of $15.3M is lower than Planet Fitness's net income of $41.9M. Notably, OneSpaWorld Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while Planet Fitness's PE ratio is 53.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneSpaWorld Holdings is 2.51x versus 7.91x for Planet Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xponential Fitness has a net margin of 6.95% compared to OneSpaWorld Holdings's net margin of -1.76%. OneSpaWorld Holdings's return on equity of 12.53% beat Xponential Fitness's return on equity of --.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.47%. On the other hand Xponential Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $13.78 which suggests that it could grow by 25.14%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than OneSpaWorld Holdings, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than OneSpaWorld Holdings.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

OneSpaWorld Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Xponential Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OneSpaWorld Holdings pays 11.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness pays out -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend. OneSpaWorld Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OneSpaWorld Holdings quarterly revenues are $219.6M, which are larger than Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues of $76.9M. OneSpaWorld Holdings's net income of $15.3M is higher than Xponential Fitness's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, OneSpaWorld Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while Xponential Fitness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneSpaWorld Holdings is 2.51x versus 1.13x for Xponential Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.