FLEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jabil has a net margin of 3.47% compared to Flex's net margin of 2.84%. Flex's return on equity of 16.55% beat Jabil's return on equity of 34.97%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $53.54, signalling upside risk potential of 0.91%. On the other hand Jabil has an analysts' consensus of $225.69 which suggests that it could grow by 0.76%. Given that Flex has higher upside potential than Jabil, analysts believe Flex is more attractive than Jabil.

Flex has a beta of 1.069, which suggesting that the stock is 6.877% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil has a beta of 1.203, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.263%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil pays out 3.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Jabil quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Flex's net income of $222M is lower than Jabil's net income of $222M. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while Jabil's PE ratio is 43.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.82x versus 0.89x for Jabil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nextracker has a net margin of 3.47% compared to Flex's net margin of 16.96%. Flex's return on equity of 16.55% beat Nextracker's return on equity of 39.39%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $53.54, signalling upside risk potential of 0.91%. On the other hand Nextracker has an analysts' consensus of $64.42 which suggests that it could grow by 6.43%. Given that Nextracker has higher upside potential than Flex, analysts believe Nextracker is more attractive than Flex.

Flex has a beta of 1.069, which suggesting that the stock is 6.877% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nextracker has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nextracker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nextracker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Nextracker quarterly revenues of $924.3M. Flex's net income of $222M is higher than Nextracker's net income of $156.8M. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while Nextracker's PE ratio is 17.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.82x versus 3.05x for Nextracker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OSI Systems has a net margin of 3.47% compared to Flex's net margin of 9.26%. Flex's return on equity of 16.55% beat OSI Systems's return on equity of 16.98%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $53.54, signalling upside risk potential of 0.91%. On the other hand OSI Systems has an analysts' consensus of $243.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.12%. Given that OSI Systems has higher upside potential than Flex, analysts believe OSI Systems is more attractive than Flex.

Flex has a beta of 1.069, which suggesting that the stock is 6.877% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OSI Systems has a beta of 1.268, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.824%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OSI Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OSI Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than OSI Systems quarterly revenues of $444.4M. Flex's net income of $222M is higher than OSI Systems's net income of $41.1M. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while OSI Systems's PE ratio is 25.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.82x versus 2.15x for OSI Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TTM Technologies has a net margin of 3.47% compared to Flex's net margin of 4.96%. Flex's return on equity of 16.55% beat TTM Technologies's return on equity of 5.03%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $53.54, signalling upside risk potential of 0.91%. On the other hand TTM Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $43.50 which suggests that it could fall by -3.4%. Given that Flex has higher upside potential than TTM Technologies, analysts believe Flex is more attractive than TTM Technologies.

Flex has a beta of 1.069, which suggesting that the stock is 6.877% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TTM Technologies has a beta of 1.458, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.832%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TTM Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TTM Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than TTM Technologies quarterly revenues of $648.7M. Flex's net income of $222M is higher than TTM Technologies's net income of $32.2M. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while TTM Technologies's PE ratio is 60.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.82x versus 1.86x for TTM Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.