CTRN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lands' End has a net margin of 0.43% compared to Citi Trends's net margin of -3.16%. Citi Trends's return on equity of -30.21% beat Lands' End's return on equity of 1.91%.

Citi Trends has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.88%. On the other hand Lands' End has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.35%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Citi Trends, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Citi Trends.

Citi Trends has a beta of 1.977, which suggesting that the stock is 97.705% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lands' End has a beta of 2.482, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 148.21%.

Citi Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lands' End offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citi Trends pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lands' End pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citi Trends quarterly revenues are $201.7M, which are smaller than Lands' End quarterly revenues of $261.2M. Citi Trends's net income of $871K is higher than Lands' End's net income of -$8.3M. Notably, Citi Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lands' End's PE ratio is 95.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citi Trends is 0.33x versus 0.29x for Lands' End. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of 0.43% compared to Citi Trends's net margin of 9.61%. Citi Trends's return on equity of -30.21% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 39.39%.

Citi Trends has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.88%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $151.01 which suggests that it could grow by 16.22%. Given that Citi Trends has higher upside potential than Ross Stores, analysts believe Citi Trends is more attractive than Ross Stores.

Citi Trends has a beta of 1.977, which suggesting that the stock is 97.705% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.014%.

Citi Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Citi Trends pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 23.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Citi Trends quarterly revenues are $201.7M, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5B. Citi Trends's net income of $871K is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $479.2M. Notably, Citi Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 20.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citi Trends is 0.33x versus 2.01x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 0.43% compared to Citi Trends's net margin of 8.15%. Citi Trends's return on equity of -30.21% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 19.26%.

Citi Trends has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.88%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $73.15 which suggests that it could grow by 1.4%. Given that Citi Trends has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Citi Trends is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Citi Trends has a beta of 1.977, which suggesting that the stock is 97.705% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.983%.

Citi Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citi Trends pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citi Trends quarterly revenues are $201.7M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Citi Trends's net income of $871K is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $108.3M. Notably, Citi Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 15.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citi Trends is 0.33x versus 1.19x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zumiez has a net margin of 0.43% compared to Citi Trends's net margin of -7.77%. Citi Trends's return on equity of -30.21% beat Zumiez's return on equity of 0.23%.

Citi Trends has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.88%. On the other hand Zumiez has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.01%. Given that Citi Trends has higher upside potential than Zumiez, analysts believe Citi Trends is more attractive than Zumiez.

Citi Trends has a beta of 1.977, which suggesting that the stock is 97.705% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zumiez has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.438%.

Citi Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zumiez offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citi Trends pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zumiez pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citi Trends quarterly revenues are $201.7M, which are larger than Zumiez quarterly revenues of $184.3M. Citi Trends's net income of $871K is higher than Zumiez's net income of -$14.3M. Notably, Citi Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zumiez's PE ratio is 1,346.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citi Trends is 0.33x versus 0.28x for Zumiez. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.